From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 14:41:22 -0800
Message-ID: <200403311441.22936.josh@agliodbs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29096.1080710306@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <200403302050.12415.josh@agliodbs.com>
<29096.1080710306@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Tom,
> This looks more like an underling with a checklist than a serious
> inquiry. Can you get them to specify particular capabilities that they
> need? In sufficient detail that we could actually answer?
Ok, talked with him. They are trying to plan OO-->DB mapping in 3
programming languages for a large project. Large enough that they would
cost out implementing these SQL99 features for us if they like PostgreSQL
otherwise. But they *do* need to complete the checklist for each candidate
database system.
So ... can anyone more familiar with SQL99 than me give some feedback?
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: josh@agliodbs.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions
In-Reply-To: <200403311441.22936.josh@agliodbs.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox