From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
To: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
Cc: Kenneth Gonsalves <lawgon@thenilgiris.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: reply to setting
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 21:15:31 -0500
Message-ID: <20040812021531.GA22747@wolff.to> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <411A8561.8060006@joeconway.com>
References: <0408070933080K.01190@thenilgiris.com>
<20040811191321.GA14350@wolff.to>
<411A8561.8060006@joeconway.com>
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 13:45:21 -0700,
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >
> >The duplication is needless. Direct replies very often get to the recipient
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> is *not* needless?
Yeah, I made a typo.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: bruno@wolff.to, mail@joeconway.com, lawgon@thenilgiris.com
Subject: Re: reply to setting
In-Reply-To: <20040812021531.GA22747@wolff.to>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox