pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Does VACUUM reorder tables on clustered indices
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 23:07:13 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <200512220407.jBM47Dp20260@candle.pha.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <60d5jqja42.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com>

Chris Browne wrote:
> jnasby@pervasive.com ("Jim C. Nasby") writes:
> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 12:34:12AM +0100, ipv@tinet.org wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >> Utilize <b>CLUSTER;</b> (after vacuum) to reorder the data.
> >
> > Why would you vacuum when cluster is just going to wipe out the dead
> > tuples anyway?
> 
> There is one reason to VACUUM before running CLUSTER...
> 
> That is that VACUUM will be *guaranteed* to draw all the pages into memory.
> 
> Subsequently, you can be certain that the pages are in cache, and that
> the CLUSTER should need to do minimal I/O to read data into memory.
> 
> If I'm considering clustering the Slony-I "sl_log_1" table, forcing it
> into memory *is* something I'll consider doing in order to minimize
> the time that would-be writers are blocked from writing...

Why don't you just do SELECT * FROM tab WHERE col != 'lkjasdflkjadsf'. 
That should pull things into memory without the VACUUM overhead.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073



view thread (16+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <200512220407.jBM47Dp20260@candle.pha.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../200512220407.jBM47Dp20260@candle.pha.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/200512220407.jBM47Dp20260@candle.pha.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, cbbrowne@acm.org
  Subject: Re: Does VACUUM reorder tables on clustered indices
  In-Reply-To: <200512220407.jBM47Dp20260@candle.pha.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox