From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Subject: Re: Does VACUUM reorder tables on clustered indices
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:25:14 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <200512300325.jBU3PEJ25533@candle.pha.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7723.1135912493@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Tom, has this bug been addressed or documented?
>
> No. Please add a TODO:
>
> * Make CLUSTER preserve recently-dead tuples per MVCC requirements
>
> I have not tested, but I suspect the table-rewriting variants of ALTER TABLE
> have the same problem.
Added.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, ajs@crankycanuck.ca, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: Does VACUUM reorder tables on clustered indices
In-Reply-To: <200512300325.jBU3PEJ25533@candle.pha.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox