From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Subject: Re: Does VACUUM reorder tables on clustered indices
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:14:53 -0500
Message-ID: <7723.1135912493@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200512300300.jBU30DW21618@candle.pha.pa.us>
References: <200512300300.jBU30DW21618@candle.pha.pa.us>
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom, has this bug been addressed or documented?
No. Please add a TODO:
* Make CLUSTER preserve recently-dead tuples per MVCC requirements
I have not tested, but I suspect the table-rewriting variants of ALTER TABLE
have the same problem.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, ajs@crankycanuck.ca, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: Does VACUUM reorder tables on clustered indices
In-Reply-To: <7723.1135912493@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox