From: Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: John DeSoi <desoi@pgedit.com>
Cc: 'pgsql-sql@postgresql.org' SQL <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: info is a reserved word?
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:57:56 -0700
Message-ID: <20060113045756.GA88336@winnie.fuhr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21184.1137126088@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <304B868D-CE4E-4E43-8B85-4CA238BB0F94@pgedit.com>
<20060113012932.GA71559@winnie.fuhr.org>
<21184.1137126088@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 11:21:28PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> plpgsql is not very good about reserving words "minimally", ie, not
> treating a word as a keyword outside the context where the keyword
> is meaningful.
>
> This could probably be fixed, or at least greatly reduced, with some
> flex/bison hacking. Anyone up for it?
Possibly. Would it involve much more than what the main parser's
grammar does with unreserved_keyword and friends? I suppose this
ought to move to pgsql-hackers.
--
Michael Fuhr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: mike@fuhr.org, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, desoi@pgedit.com
Subject: Re: info is a reserved word?
In-Reply-To: <20060113045756.GA88336@winnie.fuhr.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox