From: Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: aarni@kymi.com
Subject: Re: double precision vs. numeric
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:24:16 -0600
Message-ID: <20060824172416.GB30678@winnie.fuhr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200608241851.33892.peter_e@gmx.net>
References: <200608241936.50752.aarni@kymi.com>
<200608241851.33892.peter_e@gmx.net>
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 06:51:33PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Aarni Ruuhimäki wrote:
> > ' ... type double precision ... will be depreciated / unsupported in
> > future releases ... '
>
> That is completely false.
Presumably because double precision is standard SQL and has been
so for a long time. Perhaps Aarni is thinking about the money type,
which the documentation does say is deprecated.
--
Michael Fuhr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: mike@fuhr.org, peter_e@gmx.net, aarni@kymi.com
Subject: Re: double precision vs. numeric
In-Reply-To: <20060824172416.GB30678@winnie.fuhr.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox