From: Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>
To: Aarni Ruuhimäki <aarni@kymi.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: double precision vs. numeric
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 07:45:25 -0600
Message-ID: <20060828134525.GA4468@winnie.fuhr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200608281632.31039.aarni@kymi.com>
References: <200608241936.50752.aarni@kymi.com>
<200608281108.50394.aarni@kymi.com>
<20060828130827.GB4094@winnie.fuhr.org>
<200608281632.31039.aarni@kymi.com>
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 04:32:31PM +0300, Aarni Ruuhimki wrote:
> On Monday 28 August 2006 16:08, you wrote:
> > > So this merely means that in future one can not insert empty values into
> > > field of type double precision ?
> >
> > Right. 8.0 issues a warning and 8.1 gives an error:
>
> Ok, thanks.
>
> But NULLs will go in the future too ?
Only if Chris Date takes over the project ;-)
--
Michael Fuhr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: mike@fuhr.org, aarni@kymi.com
Subject: Re: double precision vs. numeric
In-Reply-To: <20060828134525.GA4468@winnie.fuhr.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox