pg.ddx.io pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archivehelp / color / mirror / Atom feed
Wierd Error on update 5+ messages / 3 participants [nested] [flat]
* Wierd Error on update @ 2004-08-11 20:21 Thomas Seeber <thomas.seeber@gmail.com> 2004-08-11 22:48 ` Re: Wierd Error on update Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Thomas Seeber @ 2004-08-11 20:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pgsql-sql Hi All, I am relative PostGres newbie, so if there is a simple answer to this question, please feel free to send me a link or explaination. I am running Postgres 7.3 on a intel Linux Redhat 7.3 base. I am getting two errors which are a bit confounding. ERROR: pg_class_aclcheck:relation 474653086 not found on one table within a large SQL file update (+5000 lines with documentation) that needs to be run from the command line. Both statements are multiline Update statements. This is straight SQL, not function code. Now I can guareentee that the queries refer to an existing table, but the table is being rebuilt in the core of the long SQL update. The table in question now has all permissions (my attempt to get fixed, but that did not help). Interesting aspect to this problem is that if your run the large update in one file, and then run the two update statements in a second file it works fine. Now I placed the erroring statements at the end of the large file to make sure it was not a ordering error, but that didnt help. Any ideas? Thank you Thomas Seeber ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Wierd Error on update 2004-08-11 20:21 Wierd Error on update Thomas Seeber <thomas.seeber@gmail.com> @ 2004-08-11 22:48 ` Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> 2004-08-13 16:21 ` Re: Wierd Error on update Thomas Seeber <thomas.seeber@gmail.com> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Tom Lane @ 2004-08-11 22:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Seeber <thomas.seeber@gmail.com>; +Cc: pgsql-sql Thomas Seeber <thomas.seeber@gmail.com> writes: > I am running Postgres 7.3 on a intel Linux Redhat 7.3 base. Original 7.3 release, or (I hope) 7.3.something? > I am getting two errors which are a bit confounding. > ERROR: pg_class_aclcheck:relation 474653086 not found Are there any views involved? Is the statement invoking any functions? How about triggers? Foreign keys? Rules? Also, is it always the same number in the error, or does that change from run to run? The problem looks a bit like a corrupted rule or view, but I'm not entirely sure how one would get involved in a simple UPDATE. regards, tom lane ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Wierd Error on update 2004-08-11 20:21 Wierd Error on update Thomas Seeber <thomas.seeber@gmail.com> 2004-08-11 22:48 ` Re: Wierd Error on update Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> @ 2004-08-13 16:21 ` Thomas Seeber <thomas.seeber@gmail.com> 2004-08-13 17:54 ` Re: Wierd Error on update Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Thomas Seeber @ 2004-08-13 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>; +Cc: pgsql-sql > Original 7.3 release, or (I hope) 7.3.something? Red Hat 7.3.2.96-113 Linux Version 2.4.20-20.7custom from cat /proc/version > > I am getting two errors which are a bit confounding. > > ERROR: pg_class_aclcheck:relation 474653086 not found > > Are there any views involved? No views. Is the statement invoking any functions? The statement is not invoking any fuctions However heres the statements, UPDATE school_info_l SET ind_default_data = 't'; UPDATE school_info_l SET sis_system_id = 9 where school_id IN (492, 434, 436); which are amazingly simple. Both queries return the same exact error, same error. not your > How about triggers? Foreign keys? Rules? Neither of the updates touch any rules. sis_system_id has a foreign key constaint to another table that does in it contain a value of 9 for sis_system_id in that table, but the first isnt touching anything that has a trigger or foreign key constraint attached to the column. The table school_info_l has many contraints that affect other tables however > Also, is it always the same number in the error, or does that change > from run to run? The number is the same for each time I run the update file on the same database. with this two queries having the same error. Same result to, if I run these two after the first update file finishes there is no problem, but if I try to run it at the end of hte first file, choke. Very Odd problem to me, since the update statemenets are so simple. -Tom ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Wierd Error on update 2004-08-11 20:21 Wierd Error on update Thomas Seeber <thomas.seeber@gmail.com> 2004-08-11 22:48 ` Re: Wierd Error on update Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> 2004-08-13 16:21 ` Re: Wierd Error on update Thomas Seeber <thomas.seeber@gmail.com> @ 2004-08-13 17:54 ` Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Tom Lane @ 2004-08-13 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Seeber <thomas.seeber@gmail.com>; +Cc: pgsql-sql Thomas Seeber <thomas.seeber@gmail.com> writes: >>> I am getting two errors which are a bit confounding. >>> ERROR: pg_class_aclcheck:relation 474653086 not found >> How about triggers? Foreign keys? Rules? > Neither of the updates touch any rules. > sis_system_id has a foreign key constaint to another table that does > in it contain a value of 9 for sis_system_id in that table, but the > first isnt touching anything that has a trigger or foreign key > constraint attached to the column. > The table school_info_l has many contraints that affect other tables however I would guess that one or another of these foreign-key constraints is broken. I'd suggest looking through pg_trigger to see if there are any entries with tgconstrrelid = 474653086. I wouldn't necessarily recommend just deleting such an entry, mind you, but finding where the problem is is the first step... regards, tom lane ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Wierd Error on update @ 2004-08-13 16:05 Pentilian <pentilian@gmail.com> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Pentilian @ 2004-08-13 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>; +Cc: pgsql-sql > Original 7.3 release, or (I hope) 7.3.something? 7.3 > > I am getting two errors which are a bit confounding. > > ERROR: pg_class_aclcheck:relation 474653086 not found > > Are there any views involved? No views. Is the statement invoking any functions? The statement is not invoking any fuctions However heres the statements, UPDATE school_info_l SET ind_default_data = 't'; UPDATE school_info_l SET sis_system_id = 9 where school_id IN (492, 434, 436); which are amazingly simple. Both queries return the same exact error, same error. not your > How about triggers? Foreign keys? Rules? Neither of the updates touch any rules. sis_system_id is a foreign key to another table (but the first isnt touching anything that has a trigger or foreign key constraint attached to the column. The table school_info_l has many contraints that affect other tables however > Also, is it always the same number in the error, or does that change > from run to run? The number is the same for each time I run the update file on the same database. with this two queries having the same error. Same result to, if I run these two after the first update file finishes there is no problem, but if I try to run it at the end of hte first file, choke. Very Odd problem to me, since the update statemenets are so simple. -Tom ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-08-13 17:54 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2004-08-11 20:21 Wierd Error on update Thomas Seeber <thomas.seeber@gmail.com> 2004-08-11 22:48 ` Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> 2004-08-13 16:21 ` Thomas Seeber <thomas.seeber@gmail.com> 2004-08-13 17:54 ` Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> 2004-08-13 16:05 Re: Wierd Error on update Pentilian <pentilian@gmail.com>
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox