From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Daniel Caune <daniel.caune@ubisoft.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HELP] Defining a function as a procedure
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 13:02:38 -0500
Message-ID: <22807.1138298558@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1E293D3FF63A3740B10AD5AAD88535D201663CC5@UBIMAIL1.ubisoft.org>
References: <1E293D3FF63A3740B10AD5AAD88535D201663CC5@UBIMAIL1.ubisoft.org>
"Daniel Caune" <daniel.caune@ubisoft.com> writes:
> Is there a way to define a function as a procedure, I mean a function
> that returns nothing.
In recent versions you can say RETURNS VOID, which is a bit of a hack
but it gets the point across...
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, daniel.caune@ubisoft.com
Subject: Re: [HELP] Defining a function as a procedure
In-Reply-To: <22807.1138298558@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox