pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, pgsql-general <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-performance] Large databases, performance
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 10:30:37 -0400
Message-ID: <23489.1034001037@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DA1A331.21316.F7E742B@localhost>
References: <3DA1A331.21316.F7E742B@localhost>

"Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in> writes:
> MySQL 3.23.52 with innodb transaction support: 

> 4 concurrent queries 	:-  257.36 ms
> 40 concurrent queries	:-  35.12 ms

> Postgresql 7.2.2 

> 4 concurrent queries 		:- 257.43 ms
> 40 concurrent 	queries		:- 41.16 ms

I find this pretty fishy.  The extreme similarity of the 4-client
numbers seems improbable, from what I know of the two databases.
I suspect your numbers are mostly measuring some non-database-related
overhead --- communications overhead, maybe?

> Only worry is database size. Postgresql is 111GB v/s 87 GB for mysql. All 
> numbers include indexes. This is really going to be a problem when things are
> deployed. Any idea how can it be taken down? 

7.3 should be a little bit better because of Manfred's work on reducing
tuple header size --- if you create your tables WITHOUT OIDS, you should
save 8 bytes per row compared to earlier releases.

			regards, tom lane



view thread (48+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <23489.1034001037@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../23489.1034001037@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/23489.1034001037@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in, pgsql-general@postgresql.org, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: [pgsql-performance] Large databases, performance
  In-Reply-To: <23489.1034001037@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox