From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Kenneth Gonsalves <lawgon@thenilgiris.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: reply to setting
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 03:09:28 -0400
Message-ID: <27236.1091862568@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0408070933080K.01190@thenilgiris.com>
References: <0408070933080K.01190@thenilgiris.com>
Kenneth Gonsalves <lawgon@thenilgiris.com> writes:
> any reason why the default reply-to on this list should not be set to the
> list? I keep replying to postings only to find later that the reply goes to
> the OP and not to the list. reply-all button results in needless duplication
It works fine for the rest of us. Fix your mail software.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, lawgon@thenilgiris.com
Subject: Re: reply to setting
In-Reply-To: <27236.1091862568@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox