pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean-Luc Lachance <jllachan@nsd.ca>
To: josh@agliodbs.com
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg@aon.at>
Cc: Roland Roberts <roland@astrofoto.org>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 14:37:45 -0400
Message-ID: <3D9899F9.72BD773A@nsd.ca> (raw)
References: <20020929034706.GA6199@svana.org>
	<20020929041007.GB6199@svana.org>
	<8140.1033274153@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<200209291243.45747.josh@agliodbs.com>

How can you make a difference between now('statement'), and
now('immediate').
To me they are the same thing. Why not simply now() for transaction, and
now('CLOCK') or better yet system_clock() or clock() for curent time.

JLL

Josh Berkus wrote:
> 
> Tom,
> 
> > I'd be happier with the whole thing if anyone had exhibited a convincing
> > use-case for statement timestamp.  So far I've not seen any actual
> > examples of situations that are not better served by either transaction
> > timestamp or true current time.  And the spec is perfectly clear that
> > CURRENT_TIMESTAMP does not mean true current time...
> 
> Are we still planning on putting the three different versions of now() on the
> TODO?  I.e.,
> now('transaction'),
> now('statement'), and
> now('immediate')
> With now() = now('transaction')?
> 
> I still think it's a good idea, provided that we have some easy means to
> determine now('statement').
> 
> --
> -Josh Berkus
>  Aglio Database Solutions
>  San Francisco
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
> 
> http://archives.postgresql.org



view thread (61+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <3D9899F9.72BD773A@nsd.ca>
Permalink:  ../3D9899F9.72BD773A@nsd.ca/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/3D9899F9.72BD773A@nsd.ca

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: jllachan@nsd.ca, josh@agliodbs.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, kleptog@svana.org, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, mkoi-pg@aon.at, roland@astrofoto.org, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: [SQL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
  In-Reply-To: <3D9899F9.72BD773A@nsd.ca>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox