pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>
To: pgsql-general <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Large databases, performance
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 19:33:30 +0530
Message-ID: <3D9C9B8A.30310.A16469F@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0210031353540.26902-100000@ponder.fairway2k.co.uk>
References: <3D9C8712.9513.9C6521D@localhost>

On 3 Oct 2002 at 13:56, Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
> It's one hell of a DB you're building. I'm sure I'm not the only one interested
> so to satisfy those of us who are nosey: can you say what the application is?
> 
> I'm sure we'll all understand if it's not possible for you mention such
> information.

Well, I can't tell everything but somethings I can..

1) This is a system that does not have online capability yet. This is an 
attempt to provide one.

2) The goal is to avoid costs like licensing oracle. I am sure this would make 
a great example for OSDB advocacy, which ever database wins..

3) The database size estimates, I put earlier i.e. 9 billion tuples/900GB data 
size, are in a fixed window. The data is generated from some real time systems. 
You can imagine the rate.

4) Further more there are timing restrictions attached to it. 5K inserts/sec. 
4800 queries per hour with response time of 10 sec. each. It's this aspect that 
has forced us for partitioning..

And contrary to my earlier information, this is going to be a live system 
rather than a back up one.. A better win to postgresql.. I hope it makes it.

And BTW, all these results were on reiserfs. We didn't found much of difference 
in write performance between them. So we stick to reiserfs. And of course we 
got the latest hot shot Mandrake9 with 2.4.19-16 which really made difference 
over RHL7.2..

Bye
 Shridhar

--
QOTD:	"Do you smell something burning or is it me?"		-- Joan of Arc




view thread (48+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <3D9C9B8A.30310.A16469F@localhost>
Permalink:  ../3D9C9B8A.30310.A16469F@localhost/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/3D9C9B8A.30310.A16469F@localhost

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: Large databases, performance
  In-Reply-To: <3D9C9B8A.30310.A16469F@localhost>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox