pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: pankaj M. Tolani <pankaj@pspl.co.in>
Subject: Re: Large databases, performance
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 22:05:24 +0530
Message-ID: <3D9CBF24.4516.AA1560C@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1033662394.21324.59.camel@camel>
References: <3D9CBAD7.23509.A908C61@localhost>

On 3 Oct 2002 at 12:26, Robert Treat wrote:

> On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 12:17, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> > On 3 Oct 2002 at 11:57, Robert Treat wrote:
> > May be it's time to rewrite famous myth that postgresql is slow. 
> 
> That myth has been dis-proven long ago, it just takes awhile for
> everyone to catch on ;-)

:-)

> Hmm... been awhile since I dug into mysql internals, but IIRC once the
> table was locked, you had to wait for the insert to complete so the
> table would be unlocked and the select could go through. (maybe this is
> a myth that I need to get clued in on)

If that turns out to be true, I guess mysql will nose dive out of window.. May 
be time to run a test that's nearer to real world expectation, especially in 
terms on concurrency..

I don't think tat will be an issue with mysql with transaction support. The 
vanilla one might suffer.. Not the other one.. At least theoretically..

> My thinking was that if your just doing inserts, you need to update the
> statistics but don't need to check on unused tuples. 

Any other way of doing that other than vacuum analyze? I thought that was the 
only way..

Bye
 Shridhar

--
"Even more amazing was the realization that God has Internet access.  Iwonder 
if He has a full newsfeed?"(By Matt Welsh)




view thread (48+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <3D9CBF24.4516.AA1560C@localhost>
Permalink:  ../3D9CBF24.4516.AA1560C@localhost/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/3D9CBF24.4516.AA1560C@localhost

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, pankaj@pspl.co.in
  Subject: Re: Large databases, performance
  In-Reply-To: <3D9CBF24.4516.AA1560C@localhost>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox