From: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, pgsql-general <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
To: pankaj M. Tolani <pankaj@pspl.co.in>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Large databases, performance
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 13:30:54 +0530
Message-ID: <3D9D980E.30447.102C03@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <latopug1vl51769nkn3rj2ltdhjvqrbfof@4ax.com>
References: <3D9CBAD7.23509.A908C61@localhost>
On 3 Oct 2002 at 18:53, Manfred Koizar wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Oct 2002 21:47:03 +0530, "Shridhar Daithankar"
> <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in> wrote:
> >I believe that was vacuum analyze only.
>
> Well there is
>
> VACUUM [tablename];
>
> and there is
>
> ANALYZE [tablename];
>
> And
>
> VACUUM ANALYZE [tablename];
>
> is VACUUM followed by ANALYZE.
I was using vacuum analyze.
Good that you pointed out. Now I will modify the postgresql auto vacuum daemon
that I wrote to analyze only in case of excesive inserts. I hope that's lighter
on performance compared to vacuum analyze..
Bye
Shridhar
--
Mix's Law: There is nothing more permanent than a temporary building. There is
nothing more permanent than a temporary tax.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in, pgsql-general@postgresql.org, pankaj@pspl.co.in
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Large databases, performance
In-Reply-To: <3D9D980E.30447.102C03@localhost>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox