From: Tomasz Myrta <jasiek@klaster.net>
To: Christoph Haller <ch@rodos.fzk.de>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: " Adding missing FROM-clause entry for table .... " problem.
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 11:48:51 +0100
Message-ID: <3E520F93.4000002@klaster.net> (raw)
References: <3E520C32.CD9C82FA@rodos.fzk.de>
Christoph Haller wrote:
<cut>
> is not valid SQL syntax. What will actually happen (this is a PostgreSQL
> extension to the standard) is that an implicit table
> reference is added to the FROM clause, so the query is processed as if
> it were written as
I think this extension should be removed. I found all "Adding missing
FROM..." were just results of mistake. Does anyone use this feature?
What does other Postgres users think about it?
Regards,
Tomasz Myrta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: jasiek@klaster.net, ch@rodos.fzk.de
Subject: Re: " Adding missing FROM-clause entry for table .... " problem.
In-Reply-To: <3E520F93.4000002@klaster.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox