From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: aarni@kymi.com
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: double precision vs. numeric
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:29:46 -0400
Message-ID: <7131.1156440586@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200608241936.50752.aarni@kymi.com>
References: <200608241936.50752.aarni@kymi.com>
Aarni =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruuhim=E4ki?= <aarni@kymi.com> writes:
> I vaguely remember having seen a message
> ' ... type double precision ... will be depreciated / unsupported in future
> releases ... '
> or something like that somewhere. (?)
Perhaps you are thinking of type "money"? DOUBLE PRECISION is in the
SQL standard, it's certainly not going anywhere.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, aarni@kymi.com
Subject: Re: double precision vs. numeric
In-Reply-To: <7131.1156440586@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox