From: Jorge Godoy <jgodoy@gmail.com>
To: Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Multiple DB join
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:01:03 -0300
Message-ID: <87fyfy8ayo.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060815113832.GA99592@winnie.fuhr.org>
References: <44E0EA72.2090505@indiana.edu>
<20060815103624.GA21634@phlogiston.dyndns.org>
<20060815113832.GA99592@winnie.fuhr.org>
Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org> writes:
> And why multiple databases instead of multiple schemas within the
> same database? Or even all data in the same schema? Is there a
> reason for the segregation?
I can think that spreading processing requirements should be one. And
distributing load another one. Disk space can be solved with new disks and
tablespaces, but we can't yet distribute the load through several servers
without partitioning.
--
Jorge Godoy <jgodoy@gmail.com>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: jgodoy@gmail.com, mike@fuhr.org, ajs@crankycanuck.ca
Subject: Re: Multiple DB join
In-Reply-To: <87fyfy8ayo.fsf@gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox