From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: codeWarrior <gpatnude@hotmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Anyone still using the sql_inheritance parameter?
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:14:42 -0400
Message-ID: <8989.1174493682@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <etrkj8$15jk$1@news.hub.org>
References: <28097.1174488581@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<etrkj8$15jk$1@news.hub.org>
"codeWarrior" <gpatnude@hotmail.com> writes:
> What is the potential impact for the "ONLY" qualifier ??? None I would
> expect, as the "ONLY" qualifier effectively sets SQL_INHERITANCE = off for
> that specific query --
> What about "decorated" table names: i.e: "SELECT * FROM cities*" ??? Do we
> get to keep this feature ?
Sure, I see no need to muck with either of those syntaxes.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, gpatnude@hotmail.com, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Anyone still using the sql_inheritance parameter?
In-Reply-To: <8989.1174493682@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox