From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm@myrealbox.com>
To: wanderson@nac.net
Cc: postgresql sql list <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Article on Oracle & MySQL in E-week
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:55:17 +0900
Message-ID: <EC8DF986-47E3-457F-96A3-3BB8B6B48C4E@myrealbox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4357B9F3.8060902@nac.net>
References: <4357B9F3.8060902@nac.net>
On Oct 21, 2005, at 0:38 , Wendell Anderson wrote:
> You are quite incorrect in stating that MySQL can now claim
> "parity" with
> PostgreSQL through it's release of version 5.0.
Mr Anderson,
Who are you writing to? cegarry(at)yahoo.com? Are you referring to
this article?
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1876702,00.asp
I skimmed it, but didn't see any mention of PostgreSQL. Perhaps I
missed it, or perhaps you mean another article?
Michael Glaesemann
grzm myrealbox com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc: grzm@myrealbox.com, wanderson@nac.net
Subject: Re: Article on Oracle & MySQL in E-week
In-Reply-To: <EC8DF986-47E3-457F-96A3-3BB8B6B48C4E@myrealbox.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox