pg.ddx.io  pgsql-sql@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: 8.4.1 distinct query WITHOUT order by
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:53:04 -0700
Message-ID: <dcc563d10912211453ybe3b4d6y87303e795e3115c1@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <hgotd1$mei$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <302670f20912211415n4fc73b04x19eebfb9ff0acd60@mail.gmail.com>
	<hgotd1$mei$1@ger.gmane.org>

On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net> wrote:
> Gary Chambers wrote on 21.12.2009 23:15:
>>
>> The current maintainer is unsure about being able to do the right
>> thing and recompile the code after fixing the query.
>
> Why not simply add the necessary GROUP BY?

Yeah, if you're code base is that fragile, bandaging it up by jumping
through hoops in pgsql is just putting off the inevitable when it (the
code base) has to get recompiled someday anyway.



view thread (8+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <dcc563d10912211453ybe3b4d6y87303e795e3115c1@mail.gmail.com>
Permalink:  ../dcc563d10912211453ybe3b4d6y87303e795e3115c1@mail.gmail.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/dcc563d10912211453ybe3b4d6y87303e795e3115c1@mail.gmail.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
  Cc: scott.marlowe@gmail.com, spam_eater@gmx.net
  Subject: Re: 8.4.1 distinct query WITHOUT order by
  In-Reply-To: <dcc563d10912211453ybe3b4d6y87303e795e3115c1@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox