public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Robert Treat <[email protected]>
To: David Fetter <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL WWW <[email protected]>
Cc: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
Cc: Rod Taylor <[email protected]>
Cc: elein <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL Users' Group sites
Date: 13 May 2004 10:38:36 -0400
Message-ID: <1084459116.21180.2603.camel@camel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
	<1084395267.62466.39.camel@jester>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>

hey look, a dead horse, let's go beat it...

On Wed, 2004-05-12 at 17:15, David Fetter wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 06:03:45PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 May 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> > 
> > > Josh Berkus <[email protected]> writes:
> > > > I would *love* to have the problem of so many users' groups that
> > > > they overlap.
> > >
> > > I agree with Josh.  We can sort it out if and when there's
> > > actually a conflict, but at the moment this argument seems pretty
> > > pointless.
> > 
> > I have to agree with Robert on this though ... a UG, at least what I
> > think is the defacto standard for it, is a group that gets together
> > ... linking to "PostgreSQL related web sites" is not for
> > pug.postgresql.org, or, at least, shouldn't be
> 
> Why not?
> 
> > ... a 'Related Sites' link off of www.postgresql.org, yes ...
> > 
> > I'm not so much worried about micro-managing, but there should be
> > *some* criteria for inclusion,
> 
> Great!  How about willingness to be included?  At this stage, that's
> plenty.
> 
> > and I think monthly, schedualed meetings should be a big one ...
> 
> Please pardon me while I add in a little reality check to this grand
> plan.  SF PostgreSQL Users' Group, far and away the largest to date,
> has had one once every 2-3 months.  According to this "criterion,"
> there are no pugs at all right now, let alone three fledgling ones.
> 

they at least have the intention of meeting in person, which I think is
what Mark was getting at. 

Robert Treat
-- 
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

view thread (21+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL Users' Group sites
  In-Reply-To: <1084459116.21180.2603.camel@camel>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox