public inbox for [email protected]help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Outdated docs on techdocs 7+ messages / 3 participants [nested] [flat]
* Outdated docs on techdocs @ 2003-12-18 16:26 David Fetter <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: David Fetter @ 2003-12-18 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pgsql-www Kind people, There are some pieces of techdocs that now supply inaccurate info. For example, http://techdocs.postgresql.org/techdocs/updatingcolumns.php says some things that are no longer true about ALTER TABLE, which is confusing at best. Is there some way to remove it pending edits? I'd be happy to do the edits :) Cheers, D -- David Fetter [email protected] http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 510 893 6100 cell: +1 415 235 3778 ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Outdated docs on techdocs @ 2003-12-18 16:44 Robert Treat <[email protected]> parent: David Fetter <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Robert Treat @ 2003-12-18 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Fetter <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-www On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 11:26, David Fetter wrote: > Kind people, > > There are some pieces of techdocs that now supply inaccurate info. > For example, > http://techdocs.postgresql.org/techdocs/updatingcolumns.php > > says some things that are no longer true about ALTER TABLE, which is > confusing at best. Is there some way to remove it pending edits? I'd > be happy to do the edits :) > Well... I can see that information being useful to people on older systems, so I can add a disclaimer that some of the information no longer applies to newer versions of postgresql until you can get the editing done. alternatively you could rewrite the article as an update for 7.4 systems, and I'll just put a note that the old article is being keep for historical purposes... Robert Treat -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Outdated docs on techdocs @ 2003-12-18 16:53 David Fetter <[email protected]> parent: Robert Treat <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: David Fetter @ 2003-12-18 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Robert Treat <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-www On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 11:44:10AM -0500, Robert Treat wrote: > On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 11:26, David Fetter wrote: > > Kind people, > > > > There are some pieces of techdocs that now supply inaccurate info. > > For example, > > http://techdocs.postgresql.org/techdocs/updatingcolumns.php > > > > says some things that are no longer true about ALTER TABLE, which > > is confusing at best. Is there some way to remove it pending > > edits? I'd be happy to do the edits :) > > Well... I can see that information being useful to people on older > systems, so I can add a disclaimer that some of the information no > longer applies to newer versions of postgresql until you can get the > editing done. Can do. Where do I get it, and how do I submit the edits? > alternatively you could rewrite the article as an update for 7.4 > systems, and I'll just put a note that the old article is being keep > for historical purposes... I see we need to grasp a nettle here. How many versions can the community support? Even 7.3 is starting to look a little long in the tooth... Cheers, D -- David Fetter [email protected] http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 510 893 6100 cell: +1 415 235 3778 ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Outdated docs on techdocs @ 2003-12-18 17:31 Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]> parent: David Fetter <[email protected]> 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Marc G. Fournier @ 2003-12-18 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Fetter <[email protected]>; +Cc: Robert Treat <[email protected]>; pgsql-www On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, David Fetter wrote: > I see we need to grasp a nettle here. How many versions can the > community support? Even 7.3 is starting to look a little long in the > tooth... If its a matter of existing docs for older versions, IMHO, unlimited ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: [email protected] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Outdated docs on techdocs @ 2003-12-18 18:02 Robert Treat <[email protected]> parent: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Robert Treat @ 2003-12-18 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>; +Cc: David Fetter <[email protected]>; pgsql-www On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 12:31, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, David Fetter wrote: > > > I see we need to grasp a nettle here. How many versions can the > > community support? Even 7.3 is starting to look a little long in the > > tooth... > > If its a matter of existing docs for older versions, IMHO, unlimited ... > I think I'm parroting Marc here... if the text is already written, why not keep it around? We just need to clearly mark it as older information. If you want to write something new then as far as I am concerned you can write for the most recent brand new version and to heck with the older cruft :-) Robert Treat -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Outdated docs on techdocs @ 2003-12-18 19:02 Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]> parent: Robert Treat <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Marc G. Fournier @ 2003-12-18 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Robert Treat <[email protected]>; +Cc: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>; David Fetter <[email protected]>; pgsql-www On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Robert Treat wrote: > On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 12:31, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, David Fetter wrote: > > > > > I see we need to grasp a nettle here. How many versions can the > > > community support? Even 7.3 is starting to look a little long in the > > > tooth... > > > > If its a matter of existing docs for older versions, IMHO, unlimited ... > > > > I think I'm parroting Marc here... if the text is already written, why > not keep it around? We just need to clearly mark it as older > information. If you want to write something new then as far as I am > concerned you can write for the most recent brand new version and to > heck with the older cruft :-) Not sure the scope of the changes required, but would an appendum to current text not be less confusing? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: [email protected] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Outdated docs on techdocs @ 2003-12-27 08:14 David Fetter <[email protected]> parent: David Fetter <[email protected]> 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: David Fetter @ 2003-12-27 08:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Robert Treat <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-www On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 08:53:50AM -0800, David Fetter wrote: > On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 11:44:10AM -0500, Robert Treat wrote: > > On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 11:26, David Fetter wrote: > > > Kind people, > > > > > > There are some pieces of techdocs that now supply inaccurate > > > info. For example, > > > http://techdocs.postgresql.org/techdocs/updatingcolumns.php > > > > > > says some things that are no longer true about ALTER TABLE, > > > which is confusing at best. Is there some way to remove it > > > pending edits? I'd be happy to do the edits :) > > > > Well... I can see that information being useful to people on older > > systems, so I can add a disclaimer that some of the information no > > longer applies to newer versions of postgresql until you can get > > the editing done. > > Can do. Where do I get it, and how do I submit the edits? Ya know, looking over this one and a couple of others, they should just be marked 'Obsolete.' Here's what I've found so far on http://techdocs.postgresql.org: Updating columns in PostgreSQL tables effectively by Joel Burton Compensating for Unimplemented Features in PostgreSQL 7.1 by John Pagakis and Todd Gauthier Oracle Style Data Dictionary views for PostgreSQL by Chris Brown --hasn't been updated in over 2 years, and PostgreSQL now has its own data dictionary. The following whole sections refer to uselessly out-of-date versions of PostgreSQL: "Known Bugs and Fixes" "Source code and additional functions" "Startup/shutdown scripts for PostgreSQL" This one's slightly amusing: PostgreSQL 101 by Shridhar Daithankar ib/WikiDB/backend/PearDB.php:698: Fatal[256]: wikidb_backend_mysql: fatal database error * DB Error: unknown error * (SELECT linkee.* FROM link, page AS linker, page AS linkee WHERE * linkfrom=linker.id AND linkto=linkee.id AND * linker.pagename='PostgresQL101' ORDER BY linkee.pagename * [nativecode=1030 ** Got error 28 from table handler]) The PostgreSQL FAQ is at http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html not http://www.postgresql.org/docs/FAQ.html Re: the MySQL section, just my NSHO, all the entries except Joel Barton's excellent "Things to find out about when moving from MySQL to PostgreSQL" should come with a disclaimer like: Although these can help you transfer raw data from a MySQL database, you must consider the work only partially done at that point. You will almost certainly need to re-design the database, as it will have been designed around MySQL's inherant limitations. BTW, is there something that goes through regularly and checks to see if the links still link? If there isn't, I can find one to put in cron & report to whomever it should report to :) Cheers, D -- David Fetter [email protected] http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 510 893 6100 cell: +1 415 235 3778 ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-12-27 08:14 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2003-12-18 16:26 Outdated docs on techdocs David Fetter <[email protected]> 2003-12-18 16:44 ` Robert Treat <[email protected]> 2003-12-18 16:53 ` David Fetter <[email protected]> 2003-12-18 17:31 ` Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]> 2003-12-18 18:02 ` Robert Treat <[email protected]> 2003-12-18 19:02 ` Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]> 2003-12-27 08:14 ` David Fetter <[email protected]>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox