public inbox for [email protected]help / color / mirror / Atom feed
progress update, some questions 6+ messages / 3 participants [nested] [flat]
* progress update, some questions @ 2004-04-21 12:33 Alexey Borzov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Alexey Borzov @ 2004-04-21 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pgsql-www Greetings. I almost finished the work on user-level form submits (surveys, bugs, doc comments, events and news) and have a few questions. 1) Is 'active' field in 'events' table really needed? Maybe just consider the events with end date in the future as valid? 2) Bug submit through the website just increments some sequence but the bug itself is not stored in the database. Is this the expected behaviour? What came out of a lengthy discussion about a "real" bug tracker? 3) There is *no* moderation at all for the doc comments, I suppose? You know why PHP's have such a good signal-to-noise ratio? Here is the reason: http://lists.php.net/group.php?group=php.notes ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: progress update, some questions @ 2004-04-21 12:53 Dave Page <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Dave Page @ 2004-04-21 12:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexey Borzov <[email protected]>; pgsql-www > -----Original Message----- > From: Alexey Borzov [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 21 April 2004 13:34 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [pgsql-www] progress update, some questions > > Greetings. > > I almost finished the work on user-level form submits > (surveys, bugs, doc comments, events and news) and have a few > questions. > > 1) Is 'active' field in 'events' table really needed? Maybe > just consider the events with end date in the future as valid? No, that field is now obsolete. > 2) Bug submit through the website just increments some > sequence but the bug itself is not stored in the database. Is > this the expected behaviour? What came out of a lengthy > discussion about a "real" bug tracker? Yes, that is the intended behaviour for the moment. > 3) There is *no* moderation at all for the doc comments, I > suppose? You know why PHP's have such a good signal-to-noise > ratio? Here is the > reason: http://lists.php.net/group.php?group=php.notes There is no moderation, though I believe some of the docs guys go through them before any releases to incorporate anything useful. Feel free to add some moderation if you like - an email to the list with a link to an 'approve' script in /admin would do the job I guess. Regards Dave. ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: progress update, some questions @ 2004-04-21 17:10 Robert Treat <[email protected]> parent: Dave Page <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Robert Treat @ 2004-04-21 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Page <[email protected]>; Alexey Borzov <[email protected]>; pgsql-www On Wednesday 21 April 2004 08:53, Dave Page wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Alexey Borzov [mailto:[email protected]] > > 3) There is *no* moderation at all for the doc comments, I > > suppose? You know why PHP's have such a good signal-to-noise > > ratio? Here is the > > reason: http://lists.php.net/group.php?group=php.notes > > There is no moderation, though I believe some of the docs guys go > through them before any releases to incorporate anything useful. > > Feel free to add some moderation if you like - an email to the list with > a link to an 'approve' script in /admin would do the job I guess. > Something I've been thinking of adding to our current admin stuff is an automatic email of actual approvals of news/events; I see they do something similar on the php docs by emailing out any changes, I'd really like to have that feature included if we add moderation tech to our docs. Robert Treat -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: progress update, some questions @ 2004-04-21 20:15 Alexey Borzov <[email protected]> parent: Robert Treat <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Alexey Borzov @ 2004-04-21 20:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Robert Treat <[email protected]>; +Cc: Dave Page <[email protected]>; pgsql-www Hi! Robert Treat wrote: >>>3) There is *no* moderation at all for the doc comments, I >>>suppose? You know why PHP's have such a good signal-to-noise >>>ratio? Here is the >>>reason: http://lists.php.net/group.php?group=php.notes >> >>There is no moderation, though I believe some of the docs guys go >>through them before any releases to incorporate anything useful. >> >>Feel free to add some moderation if you like - an email to the list with >>a link to an 'approve' script in /admin would do the job I guess. > > Something I've been thinking of adding to our current admin stuff is an > automatic email of actual approvals of news/events; I see they do something > similar on the php docs by emailing out any changes, I'd really like to have > that feature included if we add moderation tech to our docs. Before I actually start working on admin pages: what exactly do you want sent to the list? 1) News items/events added (like it is done now). 2) Approvals of news/events (automatically, unlike now). 3) Added doc comments. 4) Approved/deleted doc comments. ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: progress update, some questions @ 2004-04-22 20:41 Robert Treat <[email protected]> parent: Alexey Borzov <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Robert Treat @ 2004-04-22 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexey Borzov <[email protected]>; +Cc: Dave Page <[email protected]>; pgsql-www On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 16:15, Alexey Borzov wrote: > Before I actually start working on admin pages: what exactly do you want sent to > the list? > 1) News items/events added (like it is done now). > 2) Approvals of news/events (automatically, unlike now). definitely we need the above two > 3) Added doc comments. > 4) Approved/deleted doc comments. The only concern I would have about these would be to make sure that we have enough qualified people to handle these appropriatly here. Peter, you do a lot of the doc oriented stuff, do you have any input on the above two? Would it be better if they went to the docs list? Robert Treat -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: progress update, some questions @ 2004-04-23 12:43 Alexey Borzov <[email protected]> parent: Robert Treat <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Alexey Borzov @ 2004-04-23 12:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Robert Treat <[email protected]>; +Cc: Dave Page <[email protected]>; pgsql-www Hi! Robert Treat wrote: >>3) Added doc comments. >>4) Approved/deleted doc comments. > > The only concern I would have about these would be to make sure that we > have enough qualified people to handle these appropriatly here. Peter, > you do a lot of the doc oriented stuff, do you have any input on the > above two? Would it be better if they went to the docs list? BTW, in such a case there will immediately be a need to give different access rights to different people... ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-04-23 12:43 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2004-04-21 12:33 progress update, some questions Alexey Borzov <[email protected]> 2004-04-21 12:53 Re: progress update, some questions Dave Page <[email protected]> 2004-04-21 17:10 ` Robert Treat <[email protected]> 2004-04-21 20:15 ` Alexey Borzov <[email protected]> 2004-04-22 20:41 ` Robert Treat <[email protected]> 2004-04-23 12:43 ` Alexey Borzov <[email protected]>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox