public inbox for [email protected]help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Archived-At message header 6+ messages / 3 participants [nested] [flat]
* Archived-At message header @ 2008-06-18 13:51 Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Andrew Sullivan @ 2008-06-18 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pgsql-www Hi, What are the chances that, if we're going to fix the problem of archive boundaries at month end, we can do it with http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5064.txt? I just learned about this header, and it sure seems like it'd be useful. A -- Andrew Sullivan [email protected] +1 503 667 4564 x104 http://www.commandprompt.com/ ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Archived-At message header @ 2008-06-18 13:56 Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> parent: Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Magnus Hagander @ 2008-06-18 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-www Andrew Sullivan wrote: > Hi, > > What are the chances that, if we're going to fix the problem of > archive boundaries at month end, we can do it with > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5064.txt? I just learned about this > header, and it sure seems like it'd be useful. Can't we do this already, since our archives can be accessed by messageid? /Magnus ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Archived-At message header @ 2008-06-18 14:01 Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> parent: Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Alvaro Herrera @ 2008-06-18 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-www Andrew Sullivan wrote: > Hi, > > What are the chances that, if we're going to fix the problem of > archive boundaries at month end, we can do it with > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5064.txt? I just learned about this > header, and it sure seems like it'd be useful. It would be neat, but I'm not sure it can be done, because the WWW archives are handled very far away from where the message is distributed. Hmm, but 3.2 talks about using Message-Id for generating URLs that will work permanently. Interesting. There's even software for managing it. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Archived-At message header @ 2008-06-18 14:06 Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> parent: Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Andrew Sullivan @ 2008-06-18 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pgsql-www On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 03:56:56PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > Can't we do this already, since our archives can be accessed by messageid? We do, approximately. The cool trick about this is that it's a _message_ header, so it actually comes with the message. The RFC includes a pointer to w3c code that will generate these headers on the way by based on Message-ID, yes. I guess what I was thinking is that the threading-across-month issue could be solved by using these headers as the basis for building the thread back up. Maybe it's a dumb idea, though. (Nobody would accuse me of never having dumb ideas in public.) A -- Andrew Sullivan [email protected] +1 503 667 4564 x104 http://www.commandprompt.com/ ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Archived-At message header @ 2008-06-18 14:20 Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> parent: Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Alvaro Herrera @ 2008-06-18 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-www Andrew Sullivan wrote: > I guess what I was thinking is that the threading-across-month issue > could be solved by using these headers as the basis for building the > thread back up. Maybe it's a dumb idea, though. (Nobody would accuse > me of never having dumb ideas in public.) I've also thought about this in the past. I don't think it's a dumb idea -- perhaps it can be made to work. I'm hesitant to continue to build kluges on top of Mhonarc, though. (I tried to get Abhijit Menon-Sen interested in exploring the idea of using Archivopteryx to drive our archives, but he seems to have even less time for experimentation with such things than I do.) -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Archived-At message header @ 2008-06-18 15:01 Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> parent: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Andrew Sullivan @ 2008-06-18 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pgsql-www On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:01:36AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Hmm, but 3.2 talks about using Message-Id for generating URLs that will > work permanently. Interesting. There's even software for managing it. Yeah. That's why I think it's a nifty idea. A -- Andrew Sullivan [email protected] +1 503 667 4564 x104 http://www.commandprompt.com/ ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-06-18 15:01 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2008-06-18 13:51 Archived-At message header Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> 2008-06-18 13:56 ` Magnus Hagander <[email protected]> 2008-06-18 14:06 ` Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> 2008-06-18 14:20 ` Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> 2008-06-18 14:01 ` Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> 2008-06-18 15:01 ` Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox