public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedtime to move to the new code
11+ messages / 8 participants
[nested] [flat]
* time to move to the new code
@ 2004-08-14 05:06 Robert Treat <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 3 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Robert Treat @ 2004-08-14 05:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-www
I think it is time to move to the new code for www. The biggest argument
against the idea was the desire some folks had to implement a new design
along with the new code. Well, the design doesn't get done and the code gets
more out of synch as maintainance on the live site rolls on, so I think we
need to bite the bullet and move to the new code. Once it is in place we
should be able to make deisng changes much easier anyway, after all that is
part of the point of the new code. Are there any open items that would
prevent us from making the switch?
--
Robert Treat
Build A Better Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: time to move to the new code
@ 2004-08-14 05:11 Gavin M. Roy <[email protected]>
parent: Robert Treat <[email protected]>
2 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Gavin M. Roy @ 2004-08-14 05:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Treat <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-www
I'm willing to jam a new design out if we can get a common consensus on
design desires. The basic thing I got from the last round is that
people dont want anything different. Maybe it makes sense to prepare a
new site, design and all, and launch it with 8.0 when it comes out of beta?
Gavin
Robert Treat wrote:
>I think it is time to move to the new code for www. The biggest argument
>against the idea was the desire some folks had to implement a new design
>along with the new code. Well, the design doesn't get done and the code gets
>more out of synch as maintainance on the live site rolls on, so I think we
>need to bite the bullet and move to the new code. Once it is in place we
>should be able to make deisng changes much easier anyway, after all that is
>part of the point of the new code. Are there any open items that would
>prevent us from making the switch?
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: time to move to the new code
@ 2004-08-14 05:18 Tom Lane <[email protected]>
parent: Gavin M. Roy <[email protected]>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Tom Lane @ 2004-08-14 05:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gavin M. Roy <[email protected]>; +Cc: Robert Treat <[email protected]>; pgsql-www
"Gavin M. Roy" <[email protected]> writes:
> Maybe it makes sense to prepare a
> new site, design and all, and launch it with 8.0 when it comes out of beta?
That seems like about the worst possible timing :-(. You want to shake
out any problems while we are not under the spotlight.
I'd go for installing the site update any time between now and
impending-8.0-release. Per recent discussion, that gives y'all
at least a month or two wiggle room ...
regards, tom lane
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: time to move to the new code
@ 2004-08-14 09:58 Justin Clift <[email protected]>
parent: Gavin M. Roy <[email protected]>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Justin Clift @ 2004-08-14 09:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gavin M. Roy <[email protected]>; +Cc: Robert Treat <[email protected]>; pgsql-www
Gavin M. Roy wrote:
> I'm willing to jam a new design out if we can get a common consensus on
> design desires. The basic thing I got from the last round is that
> people dont want anything different. Maybe it makes sense to prepare a
> new site, design and all, and launch it with 8.0 when it comes out of beta?
Well, how about we put the new code on the site now, and then you've got
some time until the 8.0 release to get a new design running and working
efficiently? (Kind of works in with what Tom said too)
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
> Gavin
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: time to move to the new code
@ 2004-08-14 16:50 Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
parent: Robert Treat <[email protected]>
2 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Marc G. Fournier @ 2004-08-14 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Treat <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-www
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Robert Treat wrote:
> I think it is time to move to the new code for www. The biggest argument
> against the idea was the desire some folks had to implement a new design
> along with the new code. Well, the design doesn't get done and the code gets
> more out of synch as maintainance on the live site rolls on, so I think we
> need to bite the bullet and move to the new code. Once it is in place we
> should be able to make deisng changes much easier anyway, after all that is
> part of the point of the new code. Are there any open items that would
> prevent us from making the switch?
I *believe* that the new code was developed/designed on the current VM ...
is that correct? Or are there any modules that need to be installed
before it can go live?
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [email protected] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: time to move to the new code
@ 2004-08-14 17:31 Dave Page <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Dave Page @ 2004-08-14 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Treat <[email protected]>; pgsql-www
None that I know of - it just needs the content to be sync'ed, and for someone with some spare time to look at it (not me I'm afraid - but I'll be all finished on my DS in November if that helps :-) ).
Regards, Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] on behalf of Robert Treat
Sent: Sat 8/14/2004 6:06 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [pgsql-www] time to move to the new code
I think it is time to move to the new code for www. The biggest argument
against the idea was the desire some folks had to implement a new design
along with the new code. Well, the design doesn't get done and the code gets
more out of synch as maintainance on the live site rolls on, so I think we
need to bite the bullet and move to the new code. Once it is in place we
should be able to make deisng changes much easier anyway, after all that is
part of the point of the new code. Are there any open items that would
prevent us from making the switch?
--
Robert Treat
Build A Better Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [email protected])
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: time to move to the new code
@ 2004-08-16 14:39 Alexey Borzov <[email protected]>
parent: Robert Treat <[email protected]>
2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Borzov @ 2004-08-16 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Treat <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-www
Hi,
Robert Treat wrote:
> Well, the design doesn't get done and the code gets
> more out of synch as maintainance on the live site rolls on,
One has to wonder why people doing maintenance do not update the new version as
well...
> so I think we
> need to bite the bullet and move to the new code. Once it is in place we
> should be able to make deisng changes much easier anyway, after all that is
> part of the point of the new code. Are there any open items that would
> prevent us from making the switch?
The new site is online, as you know: http://alexey.beta.postgresql.org
I'd be very grateful if someone went over it and wrote down all the open items
and differences to the current site.
The code was ready ~ 2 months ago, and I was asking for the input back then:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-www/2004-06/msg00088.php
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: time to move to the new code
@ 2004-08-16 14:58 Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
parent: Alexey Borzov <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Marc G. Fournier @ 2004-08-16 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexey Borzov <[email protected]>; +Cc: Robert Treat <[email protected]>; pgsql-www
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Alexey Borzov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Robert Treat wrote:
>> Well, the design doesn't get done and the code gets more out of synch as
>> maintainance on the live site rolls on,
>
> One has to wonder why people doing maintenance do not update the new version
> as well...
Time?
> I'd be very grateful if someone went over it and wrote down all the open
> items and differences to the current site.
The only thing that looks off is the right vertical menu is wider then the
left, and seems to throw things off a bit visually ... other then that, my
standard beef about it expanding to the full width of my browser :)
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [email protected] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: time to move to the new code
@ 2004-08-16 15:07 Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
parent: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Momjian @ 2004-08-16 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>; +Cc: Alexey Borzov <[email protected]>; Robert Treat <[email protected]>; pgsql-www
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Alexey Borzov wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Robert Treat wrote:
> >> Well, the design doesn't get done and the code gets more out of synch as
> >> maintainance on the live site rolls on,
> >
> > One has to wonder why people doing maintenance do not update the new version
> > as well...
>
> Time?
>
> > I'd be very grateful if someone went over it and wrote down all the open
> > items and differences to the current site.
>
> The only thing that looks off is the right vertical menu is wider then the
> left, and seems to throw things off a bit visually ... other then that, my
> standard beef about it expanding to the full width of my browser :)
I vote we install whatever we have and then we can look at adjustments.
I am concerned if we wait for it to be perfect it will never get
installed.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[email protected] | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: time to move to the new code
@ 2004-08-16 15:21 Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
parent: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Marc G. Fournier @ 2004-08-16 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>; +Cc: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>; Alexey Borzov <[email protected]>; Robert Treat <[email protected]>; pgsql-www
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Alexey Borzov wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Robert Treat wrote:
>>>> Well, the design doesn't get done and the code gets more out of synch as
>>>> maintainance on the live site rolls on,
>>>
>>> One has to wonder why people doing maintenance do not update the new version
>>> as well...
>>
>> Time?
>>
>>> I'd be very grateful if someone went over it and wrote down all the open
>>> items and differences to the current site.
>>
>> The only thing that looks off is the right vertical menu is wider then the
>> left, and seems to throw things off a bit visually ... other then that, my
>> standard beef about it expanding to the full width of my browser :)
>
> I vote we install whatever we have and then we can look at adjustments.
> I am concerned if we wait for it to be perfect it will never get
> installed.
No arguments from here on that ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [email protected] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: time to move to the new code
@ 2004-08-16 15:35 Justin Clift <[email protected]>
parent: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Justin Clift @ 2004-08-16 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>; +Cc: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>; Alexey Borzov <[email protected]>; Robert Treat <[email protected]>; pgsql-www
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
<snip>
>> I vote we install whatever we have and then we can look at adjustments.
>> I am concerned if we wait for it to be perfect it will never get
>> installed.
>
> No arguments from here on that ...
Sounds like a decent plan. :)
+ Justin
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
> Email: [email protected] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [email protected])
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-08-16 15:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-08-14 05:06 time to move to the new code Robert Treat <[email protected]>
2004-08-14 05:11 ` Gavin M. Roy <[email protected]>
2004-08-14 05:18 ` Tom Lane <[email protected]>
2004-08-14 09:58 ` Justin Clift <[email protected]>
2004-08-14 16:50 ` Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
2004-08-16 14:39 ` Alexey Borzov <[email protected]>
2004-08-16 14:58 ` Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
2004-08-16 15:07 ` Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
2004-08-16 15:21 ` Marc G. Fournier <[email protected]>
2004-08-16 15:35 ` Justin Clift <[email protected]>
2004-08-14 17:31 Re: time to move to the new code Dave Page <[email protected]>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox