public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Oleksandr Shulgin <[email protected]>
To: Vladimir Ryabtsev <[email protected]>
Cc: Adrian Klaver <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniele Varrazzo <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:30:08 +0100
Message-ID: <CACACo5T+PBVTTgAASbEqK6cZQDwKDNSiPvfvCHsKHU3d1_Berg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMqTPqn2=Vk3Se+ieWgSmgyd8O84G-3-JzUtD1m5M1udfr=6Dg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+mi_8Y5L-gnio+RUs6XtfOqEbOAiyVS8y9XqYSkfLB8dnPd8w@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAMqTPqn2=Vk3Se+ieWgSmgyd8O84G-3-JzUtD1m5M1udfr=6Dg@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 7:27 PM Vladimir Ryabtsev <[email protected]>
wrote:

> As long as psycopg2 is not disappearing anywhere, psycopg3 seems better.
> New users will interpret psycopg2 as "more advanced psycopg".
>

I second that opinion.  Also, a suggestion to skip "3" and go with "4"
doesn't seem to help against the Python version confusion concern, assuming
there is Python4 in some (distant?) future.

My 3¢,
--
Alex

view thread (19+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?
  In-Reply-To: <CACACo5T+PBVTTgAASbEqK6cZQDwKDNSiPvfvCHsKHU3d1_Berg@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox