pg.ddx.io  pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
BUG #17802: PGLogical getting Terminated
  2023-02-20 12:46 UTC  PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>

Create user mapping without password
  2023-02-16 10:33 UTC  Aymen Rahal <aymen.rahal01@gmail.com>
` Re: Create user mapping without password
  2023-02-20 02:00 UTC  Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
  [2+ messages in thread]

PostgreSQL Windows Install Log causes errorDump in log
  2023-02-19 10:43 UTC  Stephen L. De Rudder <sldr22@hotmail.com>

BUG #17797: connection error
  2023-02-16 16:03 UTC  PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
` Re: BUG #17797: connection error
  2023-02-16 19:31 UTC  David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
  [2+ messages in thread]

BUG #17794: dates with zero or negative years are not accepted
  2023-02-15 04:21 UTC  PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
` Re: BUG #17794: dates with zero or negative years are not accepted
  2023-02-15 22:06 UTC  David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #17794: dates with zero or negative years are not accepted
  2023-02-15 22:36 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: BUG #17794: dates with zero or negative years are not accepted
  2023-02-15 23:03 UTC  David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #17794: dates with zero or negative years are not accepted
  2023-02-16 00:08 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  [5+ messages in thread]

BUG #17796: pgcrypto undecryptable blowfish data previous stored with openssl 1.1.1  with builtin decrypter one
  2023-02-15 12:15 UTC  PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
` Re: BUG #17796: pgcrypto undecryptable blowfish data previous stored with openssl 1.1.1  with builtin decrypter one
  2023-02-15 13:25 UTC  Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
` Re: BUG #17796: pgcrypto undecryptable blowfish data previous stored with openssl 1.1.1 with builtin decrypter one
  2023-02-15 14:03 UTC  agharta82@gmail.com <agharta82@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #17796: pgcrypto undecryptable blowfish data previous stored with openssl 1.1.1 with builtin decrypter one
  2023-02-15 14:09 UTC  Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
` Re: BUG #17796: pgcrypto undecryptable blowfish data previous stored with openssl 1.1.1 with builtin decrypter one
  2023-02-15 14:29 UTC  agharta82@gmail.com <agharta82@gmail.com>
  [5+ messages in thread]

BUG #17791: Assert on procarray.c
  2023-02-14 03:25 UTC  PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
` Re: BUG #17791: Assert on procarray.c
  2023-02-14 21:04 UTC  Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
` Re: BUG #17791: Assert on procarray.c
  2023-02-15 04:16 UTC  Robins Tharakan <tharakan@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #17791: Assert on procarray.c
  2023-02-15 05:06 UTC  Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
` Re: BUG #17791: Assert on procarray.c
  2023-02-15 11:16 UTC  Robins Tharakan <tharakan@gmail.com>
  [5+ messages in thread]

BUG #17782: ERROR:  variable not found in subplan target lists
  2023-02-07 13:16 UTC  PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
` Re: BUG #17782: ERROR: variable not found in subplan target lists
  2023-02-07 13:43 UTC  David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #17782: ERROR: variable not found in subplan target lists
  2023-02-08 15:42 UTC  Dmytro Hanzhelo <d.hanzhelo@indevlab.com>
` Re: BUG #17782: ERROR: variable not found in subplan target lists
  2023-02-14 12:51 UTC  Alexander Bluce <amateur@indevlab.com>
` Re: BUG #17782: ERROR: variable not found in subplan target lists
  2023-02-14 16:26 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: BUG #17782: ERROR: variable not found in subplan target lists
  2023-02-15 05:41 UTC  Alexander Bluce <amateur@indevlab.com>
  [6+ messages in thread]

BUG #17793: Query with large number of joins crashes PostgreSQL
  2023-02-14 09:33 UTC  PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
` Re: BUG #17793: Query with large number of joins crashes PostgreSQL
  2023-02-14 11:51 UTC  Francisco Olarte <folarte@peoplecall.com>
` Re: BUG #17793: Query with large number of joins crashes PostgreSQL
  2023-02-14 14:47 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: BUG #17793: Query with large number of joins crashes PostgreSQL
  2023-02-14 15:59 UTC  Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
` Re: BUG #17793: Query with large number of joins crashes PostgreSQL
  2023-02-14 16:35 UTC  Francisco Olarte <folarte@peoplecall.com>
` Re: BUG #17793: Query with large number of joins crashes PostgreSQL
  2023-02-15 02:00 UTC  Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
  [6+ messages in thread]

BUG #17760: SCRAM authentication fails with "modern" (rsassaPss signature) server certificate
  2023-01-25 11:32 UTC  PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
` Re: BUG #17760: SCRAM authentication fails with "modern" (rsassaPss signature) server certificate
  2023-01-31 12:27 UTC  Gunnar "Nick" Bluth <gunnar.bluth@pro-open.de>
` Re: BUG #17760: SCRAM authentication fails with "modern" (rsassaPss signature) server certificate
  2023-02-05 01:28 UTC  Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
` Re: BUG #17760: SCRAM authentication fails with "modern" (rsassaPss signature) server certificate
  2023-02-08 16:11 UTC  Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
` Re: BUG #17760: SCRAM authentication fails with "modern" (rsassaPss signature) server certificate
  2023-02-09 08:24 UTC  Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
` Re: BUG #17760: SCRAM authentication fails with "modern" (rsassaPss signature) server certificate
  2023-02-09 21:54 UTC  Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
` Re: BUG #17760: SCRAM authentication fails with "modern" (rsassaPss signature) server certificate
  2023-02-09 22:22 UTC  Jacob Champion <jchampion@timescale.com>
` Re: BUG #17760: SCRAM authentication fails with "modern" (rsassaPss signature) server certificate
  2023-02-09 22:45 UTC  Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
` Re: BUG #17760: SCRAM authentication fails with "modern" (rsassaPss signature) server certificate
  2023-02-10 00:24 UTC  Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
` Re: BUG #17760: SCRAM authentication fails with "modern" (rsassaPss signature) server certificate
  2023-02-10 06:32 UTC  Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
` Re: BUG #17760: SCRAM authentication fails with "modern" (rsassaPss signature) server certificate
  2023-02-10 09:33 UTC  Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
` Re: BUG #17760: SCRAM authentication fails with "modern" (rsassaPss signature) server certificate
  2023-02-10 14:02 UTC  Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
` Re: BUG #17760: SCRAM authentication fails with "modern" (rsassaPss signature) server certificate
  2023-02-11 00:13 UTC  Jacob Champion <jchampion@timescale.com>
` Re: BUG #17760: SCRAM authentication fails with "modern" (rsassaPss signature) server certificate
  2023-02-11 10:58 UTC  Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
` Re: BUG #17760: SCRAM authentication fails with "modern" (rsassaPss signature) server certificate
  2023-02-13 01:58 UTC  Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
` Re: BUG #17760: SCRAM authentication fails with "modern" (rsassaPss signature) server certificate
  2023-02-13 12:54 UTC  Gunnar "Nick" Bluth <gunnar.bluth@pro-open.de>
` Re: BUG #17760: SCRAM authentication fails with "modern" (rsassaPss signature) server certificate
  2023-02-13 17:44 UTC  Jacob Champion <jchampion@timescale.com>
` Re: BUG #17760: SCRAM authentication fails with "modern" (rsassaPss signature) server certificate
  2023-02-15 01:22 UTC  Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
  [18+ messages in thread]

BUG #17777: An assert failed in nodeWindowAgg.c
  2023-02-06 14:48 UTC  PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
` Re: BUG #17777: An assert failed in nodeWindowAgg.c
  2023-02-10 23:02 UTC  Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
` Re: BUG #17777: An assert failed in nodeWindowAgg.c
  2023-02-10 23:06 UTC  Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
` Re: BUG #17777: An assert failed in nodeWindowAgg.c
  2023-02-10 23:12 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: BUG #17777: An assert failed in nodeWindowAgg.c
  2023-02-10 23:20 UTC  Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
` Re: BUG #17777: An assert failed in nodeWindowAgg.c
  2023-02-10 23:57 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: BUG #17777: An assert failed in nodeWindowAgg.c
  2023-02-11 00:49 UTC  Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
` Re: BUG #17777: An assert failed in nodeWindowAgg.c
  2023-02-11 01:08 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: BUG #17777: An assert failed in nodeWindowAgg.c
  2023-02-11 01:51 UTC  Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
` Re: BUG #17777: An assert failed in nodeWindowAgg.c
  2023-02-12 10:30 UTC  David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #17777: An assert failed in nodeWindowAgg.c
  2023-02-12 16:19 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: BUG #17777: An assert failed in nodeWindowAgg.c
  2023-02-13 00:31 UTC  David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #17777: An assert failed in nodeWindowAgg.c
  2023-02-13 00:46 UTC  Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
` Re: BUG #17777: An assert failed in nodeWindowAgg.c
  2023-02-13 00:55 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: BUG #17777: An assert failed in nodeWindowAgg.c
  2023-02-13 03:21 UTC  David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #17777: An assert failed in nodeWindowAgg.c
  2023-02-13 05:29 UTC  David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #17777: An assert failed in nodeWindowAgg.c
  2023-02-13 05:30 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: BUG #17777: An assert failed in nodeWindowAgg.c
  2023-02-13 19:45 UTC  Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
  [18+ messages in thread]

WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-10-05 15:23 UTC  hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-10-16 05:05 UTC  Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-10-17 06:53 UTC  Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-10-17 09:13 UTC  hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-10-17 09:14 UTC  hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-10-18 11:21 UTC  Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-10-18 11:27 UTC  Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-10-19 02:00 UTC  Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-10-19 09:46 UTC  Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-10-19 10:02 UTC  hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-10-19 10:20 UTC  hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-10-19 10:44 UTC  Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-10-19 11:09 UTC  hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-10-19 11:11 UTC  hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-10-20 11:55 UTC  hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-11 14:50 UTC  hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-13 08:06 UTC  hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-14 11:38 UTC  Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-14 12:17 UTC  hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-14 13:00 UTC  Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-14 13:11 UTC  Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-14 13:24 UTC  hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-14 13:33 UTC  hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-14 16:22 UTC  Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-14 16:51 UTC  hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-15 02:20 UTC  Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-15 04:51 UTC  Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-15 05:11 UTC  Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-15 07:55 UTC  hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-15 09:01 UTC  Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-15 14:59 UTC  Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-16 04:22 UTC  Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-16 06:13 UTC  Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-16 06:38 UTC  Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-16 07:13 UTC  Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-17 01:17 UTC  Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-17 04:06 UTC  Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-17 07:25 UTC  Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-17 08:02 UTC  Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-17 10:26 UTC  hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-17 14:22 UTC  Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-17 15:55 UTC  hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-17 18:55 UTC  Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-18 11:27 UTC  hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-21 14:26 UTC  Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-21 20:08 UTC  Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-22 03:36 UTC  Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-11-22 08:48 UTC  Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2022-12-08 11:13 UTC  hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2023-02-06 08:25 UTC  Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2023-02-06 11:15 UTC  hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2023-02-06 14:18 UTC  Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2023-02-06 15:22 UTC  Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2023-02-07 08:20 UTC  Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2023-02-10 14:31 UTC  hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2023-02-13 06:45 UTC  Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
` Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
  2023-02-13 19:41 UTC  Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
  [57+ messages in thread]

array_agg(DISTINCT) caused a segmentation fault
  2023-02-13 05:29 UTC  Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
` Re: array_agg(DISTINCT) caused a segmentation fault
  2023-02-13 05:43 UTC  David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
` Re: array_agg(DISTINCT) caused a segmentation fault
  2023-02-13 07:44 UTC  David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
` Re: array_agg(DISTINCT) caused a segmentation fault
  2023-02-13 09:03 UTC  Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
` Re: array_agg(DISTINCT) caused a segmentation fault
  2023-02-13 10:00 UTC  Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
` Re: array_agg(DISTINCT) caused a segmentation fault
  2023-02-13 10:41 UTC  David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
` Re: array_agg(DISTINCT) caused a segmentation fault
  2023-02-13 12:00 UTC  Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
  [7+ messages in thread]

Optimizer failed to generate plan
  2023-02-13 10:24 UTC  xianliang.ji@esgyn.cn
` Re: Optimizer failed to generate plan
  2023-02-13 11:40 UTC  David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
  [2+ messages in thread]

BUG #17790: Download of SLES 12 SP5 - x86_64 is not working
  2023-02-13 09:21 UTC  PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>

BUG #17788: Incorrect memory access when parsing empty string as sql_standard interval
  2023-02-12 10:00 UTC  PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
` Re: BUG #17788: Incorrect memory access when parsing empty string as sql_standard interval
  2023-02-12 17:53 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  [2+ messages in thread]

BUG #17787: Seriously wrong value of pg_class.reltuples for FTS GIN index after VACUUM (INDEX_CLEANUP)
  2023-02-12 09:46 UTC  PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>

BUG #17786: Assert on indxpath.c
  2023-02-10 12:56 UTC  PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
` Re: BUG #17786: Assert on indxpath.c
  2023-02-10 20:14 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  [2+ messages in thread]

CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY cannot be executed within a pipeline
  2023-02-10 16:24 UTC  Timur <timur.luchkin@gmail.com>
` Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY cannot be executed within a pipeline
  2023-02-10 17:38 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  [2+ messages in thread]

BUG #17783: ERROR:  could not open file "base/361098/2674030_vm": Operation not permitted
  2023-02-08 23:09 UTC  PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
` Re: BUG #17783: ERROR:  could not open file "base/361098/2674030_vm": Operation not permitted
  2023-02-09 12:14 UTC  Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
` Re: BUG #17783: ERROR: could not open file "base/361098/2674030_vm": Operation not permitted
  2023-02-10 02:36 UTC  Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #17783: ERROR: could not open file "base/361098/2674030_vm": Operation not permitted
  2023-02-10 08:31 UTC  Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
  [4+ messages in thread]

BUG #17781: Assert in setrefs.c
  2023-02-07 13:16 UTC  PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
` Re: BUG #17781: Assert in setrefs.c
  2023-02-07 23:26 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: BUG #17781: Assert in setrefs.c
  2023-02-08 05:51 UTC  Robins Tharakan <tharakan@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #17781: Assert in setrefs.c
  2023-02-08 07:02 UTC  Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #17781: Assert in setrefs.c
  2023-02-08 09:15 UTC  Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #17781: Assert in setrefs.c
  2023-02-08 17:11 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: BUG #17781: Assert in setrefs.c
  2023-02-08 19:46 UTC  Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: BUG #17781: Assert in setrefs.c
  2023-02-10 06:50 UTC  Robins Tharakan <tharakan@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #17781: Assert in setrefs.c
  2023-02-10 07:34 UTC  Robins Tharakan <tharakan@gmail.com>
  [9+ messages in thread]

BUG #17784: broken URL in 15.2 release notes
  2023-02-09 14:20 UTC  PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
` Re: BUG #17784: broken URL in 15.2 release notes
  2023-02-09 14:22 UTC  Andrey Lizenko <lizenko79@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #17784: broken URL in 15.2 release notes
  2023-02-09 15:14 UTC  Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org>
` Re: BUG #17784: broken URL in 15.2 release notes
  2023-02-09 15:33 UTC  Andrey Lizenko <lizenko79@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #17784: broken URL in 15.2 release notes
  2023-02-09 16:46 UTC  Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org>
` Re: BUG #17784: broken URL in 15.2 release notes
  2023-02-09 18:50 UTC  Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org>
  [6+ messages in thread]

Was there a bug fix in the COPY command in Version 15?
  2023-02-01 04:44 UTC  h-shibata@nssys.co.jp
` Re: Was there a bug fix in the COPY command in Version 15?
  2023-02-01 07:39 UTC  Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
` Re: Was there a bug fix in the COPY command in Version 15?
  2023-02-08 03:02 UTC  h-shibata@nssys.co.jp
  [3+ messages in thread]

BUG #17779: "commit" causes error 2D000 when "set search_path" is added to the first example in section "43.8"
  2023-02-07 00:41 UTC  PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
` Re: BUG #17779: "commit" causes error 2D000 when "set search_path" is added to the first example in section "43.8"
  2023-02-07 02:17 UTC  David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #17779: "commit" causes error 2D000 when "set search_path" is added to the first example in section "43.8"
  2023-02-07 02:22 UTC  Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
` Re: BUG #17779: "commit" causes error 2D000 when "set search_path" is added to the first example in section "43.8"
  2023-02-07 18:57 UTC  Bryn Llewellyn <bryn@yugabyte.com>
  [4+ messages in thread]

 答复: exceptional result of postres_fdw external table joining local table
  2023-02-07 03:23 UTC  Qu, Mischa, Majorel China <mischa.qu@majorel.cn>
`  答复: exceptional result of postres_fdw external table joining local table
  2023-02-07 03:45 UTC  Qu, Mischa, Majorel China <mischa.qu@majorel.cn>
`  答复: exceptional result of postres_fdw external table joining local table
  2023-02-07 04:05 UTC  Qu, Mischa, Majorel China <mischa.qu@majorel.cn>
  [3+ messages in thread]


[next (older)]

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox