pg.ddx.io pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feedBUG #19485: Compilation warnings and notes with GCC 16.1.1 on new Fedora 44
2026-05-18 07:06 UTC PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
BUG #19481: multivariate MCV expression stats not applied for equivalent predicates on nullable side of LEFT JOI
2026-05-16 10:07 UTC PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
` Re: BUG #19481: multivariate MCV expression stats not applied for equivalent predicates on nullable side of LEFT JOI
2026-05-18 06:40 UTC Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com>
[2+ messages in thread]
BUG #19478: `dblink_close` can be used for injection.
2026-05-15 01:29 UTC PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
` Re: BUG #19478: `dblink_close` can be used for injection.
2026-05-16 01:24 UTC Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19478: `dblink_close` can be used for injection.
2026-05-16 04:06 UTC Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19478: `dblink_close` can be used for injection.
2026-05-16 04:28 UTC David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19478: `dblink_close` can be used for injection.
2026-05-18 03:10 UTC Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>
[5+ messages in thread]
BUG #19462: MERGE on partitioned table with INSERT DEFAULT VALUES fails with "unknown action in MERGE WHEN clau
2026-04-20 09:34 UTC PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
` Re: BUG #19462: MERGE on partitioned table with INSERT DEFAULT VALUES fails with "unknown action in MERGE WHEN clau
2026-05-17 20:21 UTC Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
[2+ messages in thread]
[PATCH] Replace debug-only Asserts with runtime checks in logical replication apply worker
2026-05-16 22:30 UTC Varik Matevosyan <varikmatevosyan@gmail.com>
` Re: [PATCH] Replace debug-only Asserts with runtime checks in logical replication apply worker
2026-05-17 01:40 UTC Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
[2+ messages in thread]
BUG #18374: Printing memory contexts on OOM condition might lead to segmentation fault
2024-03-02 06:00 UTC PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
` Re: BUG #18374: Printing memory contexts on OOM condition might lead to segmentation fault
2024-03-02 16:11 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: BUG #18374: Printing memory contexts on OOM condition might lead to segmentation fault
2024-03-02 17:00 UTC Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #18374: Printing memory contexts on OOM condition might lead to segmentation fault
2024-03-02 18:49 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: BUG #18374: Printing memory contexts on OOM condition might lead to segmentation fault
2024-03-02 19:58 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: BUG #18374: Printing memory contexts on OOM condition might lead to segmentation fault
2024-03-03 21:39 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: BUG #18374: Printing memory contexts on OOM condition might lead to segmentation fault
2024-03-04 15:00 UTC Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #18374: Printing memory contexts on OOM condition might lead to segmentation fault
2024-03-06 16:00 UTC Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #18374: Printing memory contexts on OOM condition might lead to segmentation fault
2024-03-06 20:24 UTC Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #18374: Printing memory contexts on OOM condition might lead to segmentation fault
2024-03-06 21:21 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: BUG #18374: Printing memory contexts on OOM condition might lead to segmentation fault
2026-05-16 19:00 UTC Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
[11+ messages in thread]
BUG #19354: JOHAB rejects valid byte sequences
2025-12-13 18:52 UTC PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
` Re: BUG #19354: JOHAB rejects valid byte sequences
2025-12-15 17:46 UTC Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19354: JOHAB rejects valid byte sequences
2025-12-16 00:07 UTC Jeroen Vermeulen <jtvjtv@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19354: JOHAB rejects valid byte sequences
2025-12-16 00:56 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: BUG #19354: JOHAB rejects valid byte sequences
2025-12-16 06:23 UTC VASUKI M <vasukianand0119@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19354: JOHAB rejects valid byte sequences
2025-12-16 07:42 UTC Jeroen Vermeulen <jtvjtv@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19354: JOHAB rejects valid byte sequences
2025-12-16 14:26 UTC Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19354: JOHAB rejects valid byte sequences
2025-12-16 15:41 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: BUG #19354: JOHAB rejects valid byte sequences
2025-12-16 18:42 UTC Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19354: JOHAB rejects valid byte sequences
2025-12-17 02:59 UTC Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
` Re: BUG #19354: JOHAB rejects valid byte sequences
2026-04-14 06:30 UTC Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19354: JOHAB rejects valid byte sequences
2026-04-14 08:50 UTC Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
` Re: BUG #19354: JOHAB rejects valid byte sequences
2026-04-14 10:47 UTC Henson Choi <assam258@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19354: JOHAB rejects valid byte sequences
2026-04-15 01:20 UTC Henson Choi <assam258@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19354: JOHAB rejects valid byte sequences
2026-04-15 01:49 UTC Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19354: JOHAB rejects valid byte sequences
2026-04-15 02:06 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: BUG #19354: JOHAB rejects valid byte sequences
2026-04-15 04:25 UTC Henson Choi <assam258@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19354: JOHAB rejects valid byte sequences
2026-04-15 05:57 UTC Henson Choi <assam258@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19354: JOHAB rejects valid byte sequences
2026-04-15 06:59 UTC Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19354: JOHAB rejects valid byte sequences
2026-04-16 04:53 UTC Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>
` Re: BUG #19354: JOHAB rejects valid byte sequences
2026-05-14 19:36 UTC Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19354: JOHAB rejects valid byte sequences
2026-05-16 09:39 UTC Henson Choi <assam258@gmail.com>
[22+ messages in thread]
BUG #19413: ASAN: stack-buffer-overflow in foldcase_options() with invalid ICU language tag
2026-02-19 05:26 UTC PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
` Re: BUG #19413: ASAN: stack-buffer-overflow in foldcase_options() with invalid ICU language tag
2026-05-15 16:59 UTC Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
[2+ messages in thread]
BUG #19479: 04 is happening because your metadata is advertising a package version that is not actually present
2026-05-15 06:41 UTC PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
BUG #19476: Segmentation fault in contrib/spi
2026-05-12 14:23 UTC PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
` Re: BUG #19476: Segmentation fault in contrib/spi
2026-05-12 18:04 UTC Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari.slg01@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19476: Segmentation fault in contrib/spi
2026-05-12 18:52 UTC pierre.forstmann@gmail.com
` Re: BUG #19476: Segmentation fault in contrib/spi
2026-05-12 19:27 UTC Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari.slg01@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19476: Segmentation fault in contrib/spi
2026-05-14 16:01 UTC Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19476: Segmentation fault in contrib/spi
2026-05-14 16:45 UTC Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19476: Segmentation fault in contrib/spi
2026-05-14 17:12 UTC Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari.slg01@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19476: Segmentation fault in contrib/spi
2026-05-14 18:16 UTC Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
[8+ messages in thread]
[PATCH v3 1/1] refint: Fix seg-fault in check_foreign_key().
2026-05-14 16:42 UTC Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
[PATCH v3 1/1] refint: Fix seg-fault in check_foreign_key().
2026-05-14 16:42 UTC Nathan Bossart <nathan@postgresql.org>
BUG #19474: LIKE with nondeterministic collations mis-handle literal backslashes in patterns containing escape
2026-05-09 02:22 UTC PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
` Re: BUG #19474: LIKE with nondeterministic collations mis-handle literal backslashes in patterns containing escape
2026-05-14 11:15 UTC Nitin Motiani <nitinmotiani@google.com>
[2+ messages in thread]
BUG #19477: pg_rewind does not rewind a diverging timeline
2026-05-14 09:16 UTC PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
pg_get_indexdef() output not idempotent for partial indexes with ALL(ARRAY[…])::text[]
2026-05-12 18:03 UTC Marcelo Lauxen <marcelolauxen16@gmail.com>
` Re: pg_get_indexdef() output not idempotent for partial indexes with ALL(ARRAY[…])::text[]
2026-05-13 13:51 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: pg_get_indexdef() output not idempotent for partial indexes with ALL(ARRAY[…])::text[]
2026-05-13 14:25 UTC Marcelo Lauxen <marcelolauxen16@gmail.com>
[3+ messages in thread]
[bug report] The backend process cannot reuse VfdCache cache entries
2026-05-13 13:06 UTC =?utf-8?B?ZGVuZ2thaQ==?= <784523565@qq.com>
` Re: [bug report] The backend process cannot reuse VfdCache cache entries
2026-05-13 13:41 UTC Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
[2+ messages in thread]
BUG #19439: pg_stat_xact_user_tables stat not currect during the transaction
2026-03-25 14:06 UTC PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
` Re: BUG #19439: pg_stat_xact_user_tables stat not currect during the transaction
2026-03-27 02:15 UTC Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19439: pg_stat_xact_user_tables stat not currect during the transaction
2026-03-28 05:47 UTC Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19439: pg_stat_xact_user_tables stat not currect during the transaction
2026-03-29 03:17 UTC Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19439: pg_stat_xact_user_tables stat not currect during the transaction
2026-03-30 03:14 UTC Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19439: pg_stat_xact_user_tables stat not currect during the transaction
2026-05-06 08:03 UTC klemen kobau <klemen.kobau@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19439: pg_stat_xact_user_tables stat not currect during the transaction
2026-05-07 06:35 UTC Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19439: pg_stat_xact_user_tables stat not currect during the transaction
2026-05-13 03:30 UTC Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>
[8+ messages in thread]
BUG #19473: regression error in dblink: another command is already in progress
2026-05-08 19:29 UTC PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
` Re: BUG #19473: regression error in dblink: another command is already in progress
2026-05-08 20:24 UTC Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19473: regression error in dblink: another command is already in progress
2026-05-08 21:15 UTC Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19473: regression error in dblink: another command is already in progress
2026-05-12 13:47 UTC Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19473: regression error in dblink: another command is already in progress
2026-05-12 13:59 UTC Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19473: regression error in dblink: another command is already in progress
2026-05-12 23:40 UTC Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
[6+ messages in thread]
BUG #19475: VACUUM on a partition still warns after MAINTAIN is granted on the partitioned parent
2026-05-11 07:41 UTC PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
` Re: BUG #19475: VACUUM on a partition still warns after MAINTAIN is granted on the partitioned parent
2026-05-11 14:24 UTC Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
[2+ messages in thread]
pg_restore: error: could not execute query: ERROR: schema does not exist
2026-05-07 20:06 UTC =?iso-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_T=EAcza?= <michal.tecza@softiq.pl>
` Re: pg_restore: error: could not execute query: ERROR: schema does not exist
2026-05-08 14:41 UTC Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
[2+ messages in thread]
BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor>
2026-02-26 09:57 UTC PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
` Re: BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor>
2026-02-26 14:20 UTC Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>
` Re: BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor>
2026-02-27 14:44 UTC Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor>
2026-03-02 05:09 UTC Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor>
2026-03-02 05:45 UTC Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor>
2026-03-02 06:37 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor>
2026-03-03 01:03 UTC Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor>
2026-03-03 02:41 UTC jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor>
2026-03-03 07:16 UTC Lukas Eder <lukas.eder@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor>
2026-03-03 14:32 UTC Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor>
2026-03-04 06:35 UTC Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor>
2026-04-16 06:04 UTC Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor>
2026-04-20 08:29 UTC Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor>
2026-04-20 09:05 UTC Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor>
2026-04-21 00:57 UTC Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor>
2026-04-21 01:12 UTC Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor>
2026-04-21 02:30 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor>
2026-04-21 03:20 UTC Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor>
2026-04-21 03:57 UTC Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor>
2026-04-21 05:45 UTC Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor>
2026-04-23 00:55 UTC Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor>
2026-04-23 06:51 UTC Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
` Re: BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor>
2026-04-24 12:04 UTC Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor>
2026-04-24 19:58 UTC Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor>
2026-04-30 22:04 UTC Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor>
2026-05-01 00:26 UTC Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor>
2026-05-01 01:23 UTC Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor>
2026-05-07 14:44 UTC Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari.slg01@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #19418: SQL/JSON JSON_VALUE() does not conform to ISO/IEC 9075-2:2023(E) 6.34 <JSON value constructor>
2026-05-08 08:35 UTC Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
[29+ messages in thread]
BUG #19472: CAST(-32768::SMALLINT AS REAL) fails with "SMALLINT out of range" but -32768 is valid SMALLINT value
2026-05-06 09:09 UTC PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
` Re: BUG #19472: CAST(-32768::SMALLINT AS REAL) fails with "SMALLINT out of range" but -32768 is valid SMALLINT value
2026-05-06 12:53 UTC Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
` Re: BUG #19472: CAST(-32768::SMALLINT AS REAL) fails with "SMALLINT out of range" but -32768 is valid SMALLINT value
2026-05-06 12:53 UTC David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
[3+ messages in thread]
BUG #18354: Aborted transaction aborted during cleanup when temp_file_limit exceeded
2024-02-21 12:00 UTC PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
` Re: BUG #18354: Aborted transaction aborted during cleanup when temp_file_limit exceeded
2024-02-22 02:46 UTC Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #18354: Aborted transaction aborted during cleanup when temp_file_limit exceeded
2024-02-22 03:49 UTC Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #18354: Aborted transaction aborted during cleanup when temp_file_limit exceeded
2024-02-22 05:38 UTC Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #18354: Aborted transaction aborted during cleanup when temp_file_limit exceeded
2024-02-22 07:00 UTC Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
` Re: BUG #18354: Aborted transaction aborted during cleanup when temp_file_limit exceeded
2026-05-06 11:26 UTC Alex Masterov <amasterov@gmail.com>
[6+ messages in thread]
BUG #19471: Packaging problem with ogr_fdw_18
2026-05-06 07:53 UTC PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
` Re: BUG #19471: Packaging problem with ogr_fdw_18
2026-05-06 08:41 UTC Kieran McCusker <kieran.mccusker@gmail.com>
[2+ messages in thread]
pg_dumpall can't be restored with different bootstrap superuser
2026-05-05 10:51 UTC Álvaro Rodríguez <alvaro@datadoghq.com>
` Re: pg_dumpall can't be restored with different bootstrap superuser
2026-05-05 18:23 UTC Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>
` Re: pg_dumpall can't be restored with different bootstrap superuser
2026-05-05 18:59 UTC David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
` Re: pg_dumpall can't be restored with different bootstrap superuser
2026-05-05 19:10 UTC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
` Re: pg_dumpall can't be restored with different bootstrap superuser
2026-05-05 19:40 UTC Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
` Re: pg_dumpall can't be restored with different bootstrap superuser
2026-05-06 07:15 UTC Álvaro Rodríguez <alvaro@datadoghq.com>
[6+ messages in thread]
[next (older)]
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox