From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Mentioning Slony in docs
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 09:26:01 +0000
Message-ID: <1194513961.4251.193.camel@ebony.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200711081010.14464.peter_e@gmx.net>
References: <1194509440.4251.180.camel@ebony.site>
<200711081010.14464.peter_e@gmx.net>
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 10:10 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 8. November 2007 schrieb Simon Riggs:
> > The main reason is that Slony is Copyrighted PGDG, so we own the code
> > and it is of course BSD licenced.
>
> Why is that a reason for mentioning it more prominently?
It's not, I'm assuming you'd actually like to see it more prominent.
My understanding was that we were trying to show equal favour to all of
the various solutions. This was a reason not to do that.
--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: simon@2ndquadrant.com, peter_e@gmx.net
Subject: Re: Mentioning Slony in docs
In-Reply-To: <1194513961.4251.193.camel@ebony.site>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox