From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@dalibo.com>
Cc: PG Docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: VALIDATE CONSTRAINT
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 12:43:45 -0400
Message-ID: <18778.1378140225@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5224AF98.9000905@dalibo.com>
References: <52244B75.6040507@dalibo.com>
<15351.1378133409@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<5224AF98.9000905@dalibo.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-docs>
Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@dalibo.com> writes:
> On 09/02/2013 04:50 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@dalibo.com> writes:
>>> Is there a reason, besides simple oversight, that commit
>>> 073d7cb513f5de44530f4bdbaaa4b5d4cce5f984 was not backpatched?
>> AFAICS, it was.
> That does seem to indicate it was. But it doesn't seem they made it to
> the website:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/sql-altertable.html
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/sql-altertable.html
The website has the docs as of the latest releases, and we've not issued
any new minor releases since April. (Yeah, we're overdue.)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, vik.fearing@dalibo.com
Subject: Re: VALIDATE CONSTRAINT
In-Reply-To: <18778.1378140225@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox