From: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
To: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Postgres labeling inconsistency
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 12:21:52 -0700
Message-ID: <20071005192152.GF6005@fetter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47068DD4.4080505@commandprompt.com>
References: <200710051922.01797.peter_e@gmx.net>
<20071005182650.GD6005@fetter.org>
<470685E1.6010501@commandprompt.com>
<20071005190718.GE6005@fetter.org>
<47068DD4.4080505@commandprompt.com>
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 12:17:40PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> David Fetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 11:43:45AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> David Fetter wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 07:22:01PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >>>> Some of you may have noticed that there was a move proposed to
> >>>> use "Postgres" alongside "PostgreSQL" as a product name in the
> >>>> documentation and other written resources. A change along that
> >>>> line has already been made in the FAQ.
> >>>>
> >>>> So I think what is being proposed is wrong and needs to be
> >>>> reverted.
> >>> That, or (my preference) make the change larger. I think it's
> >>> significant that the vast majority of compatible software has some
> >>> variant of Postgres and *not* PostgreSQL in the name.
> >> I have seen no evidence of this.
> >
> > For evidence, take a look at the "Products" section of the Postgres
> > Weekly News.
>
> I just read through all products sections in the PostgreSQL weekly news
> from 07-22-07 to 09-30-07.
Nice job of careful cherry-picking, but I'm not buying it.
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666
Skype: davidfetter
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to PostgreSQL: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: david@fetter.org, jd@commandprompt.com, peter_e@gmx.net
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Postgres labeling inconsistency
In-Reply-To: <20071005192152.GF6005@fetter.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox