From: Albert Cervera i Areny <albert@nan-tic.com>
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: "distributed checkpoint"
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 08:51:59 +0100
Message-ID: <200712070851.59287.albert@nan-tic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071206220348.GM8451@alvh.no-ip.org>
References: <20071206220348.GM8451@alvh.no-ip.org>
A Dijous 06 Desembre 2007, Alvaro Herrera va escriure:
> Am I the only one who finds the phrase "distributed checkpointing" a bit
> awkward? Would it be better if we used "time-distributed checkpointing"
> instead?
>
> The phrase is used in the release notes, but it's not used anywhere in
> the main docs.
To me, non-native english speaker, time-distributed seems the clearer one.
--
Albert Cervera i Areny
http://www.NaN-tic.com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: albert@nan-tic.com
Subject: Re: "distributed checkpoint"
In-Reply-To: <200712070851.59287.albert@nan-tic.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox