From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] "distributed checkpoint"
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:09:54 -0800
Message-ID: <200712121509.55019.josh@agliodbs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1197058560.6307.1.camel@hannu-laptop>
References: <20071206220348.GM8451@alvh.no-ip.org>
<1197051730.4255.603.camel@ebony.site>
<1197058560.6307.1.camel@hannu-laptop>
All,
Just FYI, it's going to be difficult to replace the name of the feature in
the PR docs at this point; I already have 11 translations. What's *wrong*
with "Load Distributed Checkpoint", which is what we've been calling it
for 6 months?
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: josh@agliodbs.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] "distributed checkpoint"
In-Reply-To: <200712121509.55019.josh@agliodbs.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox