From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
To: josh@agliodbs.com
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] "distributed checkpoint"
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 07:50:45 +0100
Message-ID: <200712130750460000@854623032> (raw)
> Just FYI, it's going to be difficult to replace the name of the feature in
> the PR docs at this point; I already have 11 translations. What's *wrong*
> with "Load Distributed Checkpoint", which is what we've been calling it
> for 6 months?
>
Are you saying the PR was 'string freezed' before rc1? And before the actual backend? I wonder how reasonable that really is...
That said we shouldn't change things around for no reason. IKn this case I think there was good motivation.
/Magnus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: magnus@hagander.net, josh@agliodbs.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] "distributed checkpoint"
In-Reply-To: <200712130750460000@854623032>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox