From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Satoshi Nagayasu <satoshi.nagayasu@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: PL - "Programming Languages" or "Procedural Languages"?
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:54:29 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <201102031654.p13GsTo09143@momjian.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D4A5B29.1010606@gmail.com>
Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just found "PL" is explained as "Programming Languages"
> in the Acronyms section.
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/acronyms.html
>
> I think this should be "Procedural Languages" because
> "Procedural" is used in the Server Programming section.
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/server-programming.html
>
> I've created a patch, but which should we use?
"Procedural Languages" is correct. Patch applied. Thanks.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: bruce@momjian.us, satoshi.nagayasu@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PL - "Programming Languages" or "Procedural Languages"?
In-Reply-To: <201102031654.p13GsTo09143@momjian.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox