From: Satoshi Nagayasu <satoshi.nagayasu@gmail.com>
To: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: PL - "Programming Languages" or "Procedural Languages"?
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 16:37:13 +0900
Message-ID: <4D4A5B29.1010606@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi all,
I just found "PL" is explained as "Programming Languages"
in the Acronyms section.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/acronyms.html
I think this should be "Procedural Languages" because
"Procedural" is used in the Server Programming section.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/server-programming.html
I've created a patch, but which should we use?
Regards,
--
NAGAYASU Satoshi <satoshi.nagayasu@gmail.com>
Attachments:acronyms.sgml.diff (text/plain, 474B) downloaddiff --git a/doc/src/sgml/acronyms.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/acronyms.sgmlindex 5dad0db..d1ef489 100644--- a/doc/src/sgml/acronyms.sgml+++ b/doc/src/sgml/acronyms.sgml@@ -513,7 +513,7 @@
<term><acronym>PL</acronym></term>
<listitem>
<para>
- <link linkend="server-programming">Programming Languages (server-side)</link>+ <link linkend="server-programming">Procedural Languages (server-side)</link>
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: satoshi.nagayasu@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PL - "Programming Languages" or "Procedural Languages"?
In-Reply-To: <4D4A5B29.1010606@gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox