pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: osdba <mailtch@163.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:22:17 -0400
Message-ID: <20200824142217.GH26781@momjian.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200822185902.GA11024@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <2208818.1598117220@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20200822185902.GA11024@alvherre.pgsql>

On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 02:59:02PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2020-Aug-22, Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> > If you don't want to go all the way and list the operators with their
> > input types, maybe we should just do what the OP thought was correct
> > and delete the duplicate operator names.  It's already the case that
> > the table isn't telling you exactly which input types the operators
> > accept, so why not be a little bit fuzzier?
> 
> Well, if we're going to have a table, let's have a useful table.  What's
> wrong with using the same contents \dAo shows? It seemed reasonable
> enough to me.

I don't think it is worth it, plus we would need to adjust the docs if
system catalog layout changes.  I think we just want something concise
and simple, but also accurate.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

  The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee






view thread (28+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20200824142217.GH26781@momjian.us>
Permalink:  ../20200824142217.GH26781@momjian.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20200824142217.GH26781@momjian.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: bruce@momjian.us, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, michael@paquier.xyz, mailtch@163.com
  Subject: Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?
  In-Reply-To: <20200824142217.GH26781@momjian.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox