From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: osdba <mailtch@163.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 18:10:28 -0400
Message-ID: <20200825221028.GA24594@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200825044403.GC2017@paquier.xyz>
On 2020-Aug-25, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I think so. If there are other places, it does not prevent improving
> what we already know needs improvement.
>
> FWIW, the layout I was thinking about is something like the patch
> attached.
This looks to me enough of an improvement that I +1 it, and yes this is
what I was imagining also.
(With the non-website stylesheet, as in the screenshot you showed, the
table looks somewhat crammed and visually unappealing; but the website
stylesheet looks pleasing enough. Screenshot attached.)
> I have only patched GIN to give an idea of the shape of the
> tables.
I suppose a commit would change all the index AMs where we document this
kind of thing.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Attachments:gin-opclasses.png (image/png, 43.0K) downloadview image
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, michael@paquier.xyz, bruce@momjian.us, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, mailtch@163.com
Subject: Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?
In-Reply-To: <20200825221028.GA24594@alvherre.pgsql>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox