public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Minor Typo in SELECT docs
11+ messages / 6 participants
[nested] [flat]

* Minor Typo in SELECT docs
@ 2004-09-08 21:36  Thomas F.O'Connell <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread

From: Thomas F.O'Connell @ 2004-09-08 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-docs

There is a reference to the "sql_interitance" configuration in the 
7.4.x docs:

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/static/sql-select.html

I don't know whether their will be anything beyond 7.4.5, but this 
would be an easy patch.

-tfo

^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: Minor Typo in SELECT docs
@ 2004-09-09 23:31  Neil Conway <[email protected]>
  parent: Thomas F.O'Connell <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread

From: Neil Conway @ 2004-09-09 23:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas F.O'Connell <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-docs

Thomas F.O'Connell wrote:
> There is a reference to the "sql_interitance" configuration in the 7.4.x 
> docs:

Since it's fixed in HEAD, I think we're fine -- we usually don't bother 
applying documentation fixes to release branches, even if there were 
plans for another 7.4.x release.

-Neil




^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: Minor Typo in SELECT docs
@ 2004-09-09 23:47  Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
  parent: Neil Conway <[email protected]>
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread

From: Alvaro Herrera @ 2004-09-09 23:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Neil Conway <[email protected]>; +Cc: Thomas F.O'Connell <[email protected]>; pgsql-docs

On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 09:31:09AM +1000, Neil Conway wrote:
> Thomas F.O'Connell wrote:
> >There is a reference to the "sql_interitance" configuration in the 7.4.x 
> >docs:
> 
> Since it's fixed in HEAD, I think we're fine -- we usually don't bother 
> applying documentation fixes to release branches, even if there were 
> plans for another 7.4.x release.

Oh, is this really a good policy?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"I personally became interested in Linux while I was dating an English major
who wouldn't know an operating system if it walked up and bit him."
(Val Henson)




^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: Minor Typo in SELECT docs
@ 2004-09-09 23:50  Thomas F.O'Connell <[email protected]>
  parent: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread

From: Thomas F.O'Connell @ 2004-09-09 23:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Neil Conway <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-docs

I second Alvaro: Why is that?

-tfo

On Sep 9, 2004, at 6:47 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 09:31:09AM +1000, Neil Conway wrote:
>> Thomas F.O'Connell wrote:
>>> There is a reference to the "sql_interitance" configuration in the 
>>> 7.4.x
>>> docs:
>>
>> Since it's fixed in HEAD, I think we're fine -- we usually don't 
>> bother
>> applying documentation fixes to release branches, even if there were
>> plans for another 7.4.x release.
>
> Oh, is this really a good policy?




^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: Minor Typo in SELECT docs
@ 2004-09-10 03:41  Tom Lane <[email protected]>
  parent: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread

From: Tom Lane @ 2004-09-10 03:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>; +Cc: Neil Conway <[email protected]>; Thomas F.O'Connell <[email protected]>; pgsql-docs

Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 09:31:09AM +1000, Neil Conway wrote:
>> Since it's fixed in HEAD, I think we're fine -- we usually don't bother 
>> applying documentation fixes to release branches, even if there were 
>> plans for another 7.4.x release.

> Oh, is this really a good policy?

It's not so much that we have a "policy" as that we have a finite number
of committers with finite time.  If any committer wants to go and fix
this trivial typo in a back branch, no one will say boo.  But I doubt
any of us will take the time either.  There are a lot of typos besides
this one, and always have been.  Personally I'd rather spend the time
proofing current docs.

			regards, tom lane



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: Minor Typo in SELECT docs
@ 2004-09-10 04:44  Neil Conway <[email protected]>
  parent: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread

From: Neil Conway @ 2004-09-10 04:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tom Lane <[email protected]>; +Cc: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>; Thomas F.O'Connell <[email protected]>; pgsql-docs

Tom Lane wrote:
> There are a lot of typos besides this one, and always have been.
> Personally I'd rather spend the time proofing current docs.

Also, there's been a tendency in the past to not regenerate the online 
docs for each point release in a stable branch (particularly for formats 
like PS and PDF). So that's been another reason we haven't bothered with 
this in the past. I tend to agree with Tom that it's not really worth 
the trouble to backport these kinds of fixes, as long as it's just a 
cosmetic typo.

-Neil




^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: Minor Typo in SELECT docs
@ 2004-09-10 08:56  Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
  parent: Neil Conway <[email protected]>
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread

From: Peter Eisentraut @ 2004-09-10 08:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Neil Conway <[email protected]>; Thomas F.O'Connell <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-docs

Neil Conway wrote:
> Thomas F.O'Connell wrote:
> > There is a reference to the "sql_interitance" configuration in the
> > 7.4.x docs:
>
> Since it's fixed in HEAD, I think we're fine -- we usually don't
> bother applying documentation fixes to release branches, even if
> there were plans for another 7.4.x release.

I was under the impression that we usually do.  Time permitting, of 
course.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/




^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: Minor Typo in SELECT docs
@ 2004-09-10 12:56  Robert Treat <[email protected]>
  parent: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread

From: Robert Treat @ 2004-09-10 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>; +Cc: Neil Conway <[email protected]>; Thomas F.O'Connell <[email protected]>; pgsql-docs

On Friday 10 September 2004 04:56, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Neil Conway wrote:
> > Thomas F.O'Connell wrote:
> > > There is a reference to the "sql_interitance" configuration in the
> > > 7.4.x docs:
> >
> > Since it's fixed in HEAD, I think we're fine -- we usually don't
> > bother applying documentation fixes to release branches, even if
> > there were plans for another 7.4.x release.
>
> I was under the impression that we usually do.  Time permitting, of
> course.
>

Well, we've certainly been getting drilled to regenerate the idocs on the 
website with each new release in the 7.4.x series. 

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: Minor Typo in SELECT docs
@ 2004-09-10 14:53  Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
  parent: Robert Treat <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread

From: Peter Eisentraut @ 2004-09-10 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Robert Treat <[email protected]>; +Cc: Neil Conway <[email protected]>; Thomas F.O'Connell <[email protected]>; pgsql-docs

Robert Treat wrote:
> On Friday 10 September 2004 04:56, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Neil Conway wrote:
> > > Thomas F.O'Connell wrote:
> > > > There is a reference to the "sql_interitance" configuration in
> > > > the 7.4.x docs:
> > >
> > > Since it's fixed in HEAD, I think we're fine -- we usually don't
> > > bother applying documentation fixes to release branches, even if
> > > there were plans for another 7.4.x release.
> >
> > I was under the impression that we usually do.  Time permitting, of
> > course.
>
> Well, we've certainly been getting drilled to regenerate the idocs on
> the website with each new release in the 7.4.x series.

Yes, that was me among others, exactly because of the above.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/




^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: Minor Typo in SELECT docs
@ 2004-09-10 16:41  Thomas F.O'Connell <[email protected]>
  parent: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread

From: Thomas F.O'Connell @ 2004-09-10 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>; +Cc: Neil Conway <[email protected]>; pgsql-docs; Robert Treat <[email protected]>

Well, here's a patch for select.sgml should a committer ever feel 
inspired:

@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@
          the default behavior.  (In releases before 7.1,
          <literal>ONLY</> was the default behavior.)  The default
          behavior can be modified by changing the
-        <varname>sql_interitance</varname> configuration option.
+        <varname>sql_inheritance</varname> configuration option.
         </para>
        </listitem>
       </varlistentry>

-tfo

On Sep 10, 2004, at 9:53 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> Robert Treat wrote:
>> On Friday 10 September 2004 04:56, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> Neil Conway wrote:
>>>> Thomas F.O'Connell wrote:
>>>>> There is a reference to the "sql_interitance" configuration in
>>>>> the 7.4.x docs:
>>>>
>>>> Since it's fixed in HEAD, I think we're fine -- we usually don't
>>>> bother applying documentation fixes to release branches, even if
>>>> there were plans for another 7.4.x release.
>>>
>>> I was under the impression that we usually do.  Time permitting, of
>>> course.
>>
>> Well, we've certainly been getting drilled to regenerate the idocs on
>> the website with each new release in the 7.4.x series.
>
> Yes, that was me among others, exactly because of the above.
>
> -- 
> Peter Eisentraut
> http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/




^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread

* Re: Minor Typo in SELECT docs
@ 2004-09-13 12:01  Neil Conway <[email protected]>
  parent: Thomas F.O'Connell <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread

From: Neil Conway @ 2004-09-13 12:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas F.O'Connell <[email protected]>; +Cc: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>; pgsql-docs; Robert Treat <[email protected]>

On Sat, 2004-09-11 at 02:41, Thomas F.O'Connell wrote:
> Well, here's a patch for select.sgml should a committer ever feel 
> inspired:

Patch applied -- thanks.

-Neil






^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 11+ messages in thread


end of thread, other threads:[~2004-09-13 12:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-09-08 21:36 Minor Typo in SELECT docs Thomas F.O'Connell <[email protected]>
2004-09-09 23:31 ` Neil Conway <[email protected]>
2004-09-09 23:47   ` Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
2004-09-09 23:50     ` Thomas F.O'Connell <[email protected]>
2004-09-10 03:41     ` Tom Lane <[email protected]>
2004-09-10 04:44       ` Neil Conway <[email protected]>
2004-09-10 08:56   ` Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
2004-09-10 12:56     ` Robert Treat <[email protected]>
2004-09-10 14:53       ` Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
2004-09-10 16:41         ` Thomas F.O'Connell <[email protected]>
2004-09-13 12:01           ` Neil Conway <[email protected]>

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox