From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Ganesh A Hegde <sgurukrupa@gmail.com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Pg Docs <pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: typo in sentence
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 17:24:33 -0400
Message-ID: <2462511.1596576273@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHaFfc4iKxjARcH19=Z_Zr93WuYqQjJLNy6KftZuLb4JBWc4mg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <159557805290.620.5799935291704169810@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
<CABUevEwvvQT568VCHwLkAyvSRUj7Jj0um46g4HUawDSLqr+ceA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAHaFfc4iKxjARcH19=Z_Zr93WuYqQjJLNy6KftZuLb4JBWc4mg@mail.gmail.com>
Ganesh A Hegde <sgurukrupa@gmail.com> writes:
> There is only a single sentence starting with 'if' and not two. The phrase
> 'it is therefore ..' is preceded by a comma and not a period. Hence,
> there's a single sentence and not two as you are referring to.
I concur with Magnus that the "therefore" refers to the sentences
preceding this one. While we could just drop it as you suggest,
maybe better is to rearrange:
Therefore, if one PostgreSQL server instance is to house projects or
users that should be separate and for the most part unaware of each
other, it is recommended to put them into separate databases.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, sgurukrupa@gmail.com, magnus@hagander.net, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: typo in sentence
In-Reply-To: <2462511.1596576273@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox