pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: osdba <mailtch@163.com>
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 18:17:28 -0400
Message-ID: <2770080.1598393848@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200825221028.GA24594@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <20200825221028.GA24594@alvherre.pgsql>

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2020-Aug-25, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> FWIW, the layout I was thinking about is something like the patch
>> attached.

> This looks to me enough of an improvement that I +1 it, and yes this is
> what I was imagining also.

I think it's a good idea too.

> (With the non-website stylesheet, as in the screenshot you showed, the
> table looks somewhat crammed and visually unappealing; but the website
> stylesheet looks pleasing enough.  Screenshot attached.)

I wonder if it would look better if we suppress the horizontal rules
between the operator names within a cell.  IIRC, it's possible to do
that, though the exact incantation isn't coming to mind right now.

> I suppose a commit would change all the index AMs where we document this
> kind of thing.

Yeah, we should make all these sorts of tables consistent.

			regards, tom lane





view thread (28+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <2770080.1598393848@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../2770080.1598393848@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/2770080.1598393848@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, michael@paquier.xyz, bruce@momjian.us, mailtch@163.com
  Subject: Re: Document "59.2. Built-in Operator Classes" have a clerical error?
  In-Reply-To: <2770080.1598393848@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox