pg.ddx.io pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feedPL - "Programming Languages" or "Procedural Languages"?
3+ messages / 3 participants
[nested] [flat]
* PL - "Programming Languages" or "Procedural Languages"?
@ 2011-02-03 07:37 Satoshi Nagayasu <satoshi.nagayasu@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Satoshi Nagayasu @ 2011-02-03 07:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-docs
Hi all,
I just found "PL" is explained as "Programming Languages"
in the Acronyms section.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/acronyms.html
I think this should be "Procedural Languages" because
"Procedural" is used in the Server Programming section.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/server-programming.html
I've created a patch, but which should we use?
Regards,
--
NAGAYASU Satoshi <satoshi.nagayasu@gmail.com>
Attachments:
acronyms.sgml.diff (text/plain, 474B) download
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/acronyms.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/acronyms.sgml
index 5dad0db..d1ef489 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/acronyms.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/acronyms.sgml
@@ -513,7 +513,7 @@
<term><acronym>PL</acronym></term>
<listitem>
<para>
- <link linkend="server-programming">Programming Languages (server-side)</link>
+ <link linkend="server-programming">Procedural Languages (server-side)</link>
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
* Re: PL - "Programming Languages" or "Procedural Languages"?
@ 2011-02-03 14:25 Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com>
parent: Satoshi Nagayasu <satoshi.nagayasu@gmail.com>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Josh Kupershmidt @ 2011-02-03 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Satoshi Nagayasu <satoshi.nagayasu@gmail.com>; +Cc: pgsql-docs
2011/2/3 Satoshi Nagayasu <satoshi.nagayasu@gmail.com>:
> Hi all,
>
> I just found "PL" is explained as "Programming Languages"
> in the Acronyms section.
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/acronyms.html
>
> I think this should be "Procedural Languages" because
> "Procedural" is used in the Server Programming section.
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/server-programming.html
>
> I've created a patch, but which should we use?
There was some consensus that "procedural languages" makes sense:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-01/msg01485.php
Josh
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: PL - "Programming Languages" or "Procedural Languages"?
@ 2011-02-03 16:54 Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
parent: Satoshi Nagayasu <satoshi.nagayasu@gmail.com>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Momjian @ 2011-02-03 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Satoshi Nagayasu <satoshi.nagayasu@gmail.com>; +Cc: pgsql-docs
Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just found "PL" is explained as "Programming Languages"
> in the Acronyms section.
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/acronyms.html
>
> I think this should be "Procedural Languages" because
> "Procedural" is used in the Server Programming section.
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/server-programming.html
>
> I've created a patch, but which should we use?
"Procedural Languages" is correct. Patch applied. Thanks.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-03 16:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-02-03 07:37 PL - "Programming Languages" or "Procedural Languages"? Satoshi Nagayasu <satoshi.nagayasu@gmail.com>
2011-02-03 14:25 ` Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com>
2011-02-03 16:54 ` Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox