From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: pgsql-docs@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Inconsistencies in our SGML output
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 17:29:36 -0400
Message-ID: <7818.1060896576@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
Does anyone know why the very same cross-reference,
<xref linkend="reference">
renders as "Part VI" here:
http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql.html
and on the next page as "Part VI in PostgreSQL 7.4beta1 Documentation":
http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql-syntax.html
Given that we're building just one book now, the latter form seems
overly verbose to me.
Another oddity can be seen in the table of contents for the plpgsql
chapter,
http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/plpgsql.html
Why is there no TOC entry for subsection 40.2.1? It seems to be made
with <sect2> just the same as the other subsections.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Subject: Re: Inconsistencies in our SGML output
In-Reply-To: <7818.1060896576@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox