pg.ddx.io pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archivehelp / color / mirror / Atom feed
Inconsistencies in our SGML output 2+ messages / 2 participants [nested] [flat]
* Inconsistencies in our SGML output @ 2003-08-14 21:29 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Tom Lane @ 2003-08-14 21:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pgsql-docs Does anyone know why the very same cross-reference, <xref linkend="reference"> renders as "Part VI" here: http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql.html and on the next page as "Part VI in PostgreSQL 7.4beta1 Documentation": http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql-syntax.html Given that we're building just one book now, the latter form seems overly verbose to me. Another oddity can be seen in the table of contents for the plpgsql chapter, http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/plpgsql.html Why is there no TOC entry for subsection 40.2.1? It seems to be made with <sect2> just the same as the other subsections. regards, tom lane ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Inconsistencies in our SGML output @ 2003-08-19 08:16 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> parent: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Peter Eisentraut @ 2003-08-19 08:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>; +Cc: pgsql-docs Tom Lane writes: > Does anyone know why the very same cross-reference, > <xref linkend="reference"> > renders as "Part VI" here: > http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql.html > and on the next page as "Part VI in PostgreSQL 7.4beta1 Documentation": > http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql-syntax.html > Given that we're building just one book now, the latter form seems > overly verbose to me. Apparently, there is a bug in the stylesheets. I'm looking at it. > Another oddity can be seen in the table of contents for the plpgsql > chapter, > http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/plpgsql.html > Why is there no TOC entry for subsection 40.2.1? It seems to be made > with <sect2> just the same as the other subsections. The stylesheets deliberately don't make a TOC for a particular level if it would consist of just one entry. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-08-19 08:16 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2003-08-14 21:29 Inconsistencies in our SGML output Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> 2003-08-19 08:16 ` Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox