pg.ddx.io  pgsql-docs@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Inconsistencies in our SGML output
2+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]

* Inconsistencies in our SGML output
@ 2003-08-14 21:29 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
  2003-08-19 08:16 ` Re: Inconsistencies in our SGML output Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread

From: Tom Lane @ 2003-08-14 21:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pgsql-docs

Does anyone know why the very same cross-reference,
	 <xref linkend="reference">
renders as "Part VI" here:
	http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql.html
and on the next page as "Part VI in PostgreSQL 7.4beta1 Documentation":
	http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql-syntax.html
Given that we're building just one book now, the latter form seems
overly verbose to me.

Another oddity can be seen in the table of contents for the plpgsql
chapter,
	http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/plpgsql.html
Why is there no TOC entry for subsection 40.2.1?  It seems to be made
with <sect2> just the same as the other subsections.

			regards, tom lane



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Inconsistencies in our SGML output
  2003-08-14 21:29 Inconsistencies in our SGML output Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
@ 2003-08-19 08:16 ` Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread

From: Peter Eisentraut @ 2003-08-19 08:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>; +Cc: pgsql-docs

Tom Lane writes:

> Does anyone know why the very same cross-reference,
> 	 <xref linkend="reference">
> renders as "Part VI" here:
> 	http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql.html
> and on the next page as "Part VI in PostgreSQL 7.4beta1 Documentation":
> 	http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql-syntax.html
> Given that we're building just one book now, the latter form seems
> overly verbose to me.

Apparently, there is a bug in the stylesheets.  I'm looking at it.

> Another oddity can be seen in the table of contents for the plpgsql
> chapter,
> 	http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/plpgsql.html
> Why is there no TOC entry for subsection 40.2.1?  It seems to be made
> with <sect2> just the same as the other subsections.

The stylesheets deliberately don't make a TOC for a particular level if
it would consist of just one entry.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread


end of thread, other threads:[~2003-08-19 08:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-08-14 21:29 Inconsistencies in our SGML output Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2003-08-19 08:16 ` Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox