public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedThe type of ssl_renegotiation_limit
2+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]
* The type of ssl_renegotiation_limit
@ 2010-03-17 02:28 Fujii Masao <[email protected]>
2010-03-17 18:04 ` Re: The type of ssl_renegotiation_limit Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Fujii Masao @ 2010-03-17 02:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-docs
Hi,
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/runtime-config-connection.html#RUNTIME-CONFIG-CONNEC...
> ssl_renegotiation_limit (int)
It's described that the type of ssl_renegotiation_limit is "int".
Though it's not apparent error, we should use "integer" rather than
"int". In the description of other parameters, "integer" has been
used. Here is the patch.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
Attachments:
[application/octet-stream] ssl_renegotiation_limit_type_v1.patch (801B, 2-ssl_renegotiation_limit_type_v1.patch)
download | inline diff:
*** a/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml
--- b/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml
***************
*** 607,613 **** SET ENABLE_SEQSCAN TO OFF;
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry id="guc-ssl-renegotiation-limit" xreflabel="ssl_renegotiation_limit">
! <term><varname>ssl_renegotiation_limit</varname> (<type>int</type>)</term>
<indexterm>
<primary><varname>ssl_renegotiation_limit</> configuration parameter</primary>
</indexterm>
--- 607,613 ----
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry id="guc-ssl-renegotiation-limit" xreflabel="ssl_renegotiation_limit">
! <term><varname>ssl_renegotiation_limit</varname> (<type>integer</type>)</term>
<indexterm>
<primary><varname>ssl_renegotiation_limit</> configuration parameter</primary>
</indexterm>
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: The type of ssl_renegotiation_limit
2010-03-17 02:28 The type of ssl_renegotiation_limit Fujii Masao <[email protected]>
@ 2010-03-17 18:04 ` Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Magnus Hagander @ 2010-03-17 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fujii Masao <[email protected]>; +Cc: pgsql-docs
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 03:28, Fujii Masao <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/runtime-config-connection.html#RUNTIME-CONFIG-CONNEC...
>
>> ssl_renegotiation_limit (int)
>
> It's described that the type of ssl_renegotiation_limit is "int".
> Though it's not apparent error, we should use "integer" rather than
> "int". In the description of other parameters, "integer" has been
> used. Here is the patch.
You are right, of course. Applied, thanks!
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-03-17 18:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-03-17 02:28 The type of ssl_renegotiation_limit Fujii Masao <[email protected]>
2010-03-17 18:04 ` Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox