From: Usama Dar <munir.usama@gmail.com>
To: Michael Paesold <mpaesold@gmx.at>
Cc: NikhilS <nikkhils@gmail.com>
Cc: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Cc: Jonah H. Harris <jonah.harris@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Partition: use triggers instead of rules
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:48:33 +0500
Message-ID: <ff0e67090711290748tcae3037lb3aac4eb5423c6df@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <474EDAE2.3010705@gmx.at>
References: <20071128202615.GG24146@fetter.org>
<21686.1196283184@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<36e682920711281858x9a37039sa104036bf025de41@mail.gmail.com>
<20071129031702.GU24146@fetter.org>
<2854.1196315753@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<20071128224154.06f950c9@commandprompt.com>
<d3c4af540711290705q35ea51cdkfaa94b0c07a1aecc@mail.gmail.com>
<474EDAE2.3010705@gmx.at>
i would say have both, but just mention that for performance reasons its
better to use triggers.
On Nov 29, 2007 8:29 PM, Michael Paesold <mpaesold@gmx.at> wrote:
> NikhilS wrote:
> >> The argument I made for keeping the example around is not
> > dependent on
> >> the assumption that using a rule is a good idea. It's dependent on
> >> the established fact that we have recommended that in prior
> >> releases, and therefore people are going to be seeing that
> >> construct in real databases.
> >
> > And they could refer back to the older version of the documentation
> > for it. In fact, we should mention that in the patch:
> >
> > <note><para>If you have a partitioning setup that uses rules please
> > refer to the 8.2 documentation on partitioning</para></note>
> >
> > +1
>
> I would also add another sentence about *why* the recommendation was
> changed. We have one rule-based setup here, and it has been working
> flawlessly for us,... so personally I don't even know the reasons.
>
> Best Regards
> Michael Paesold
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
--
Usama Munir Dar
Consultant Architect
Cell:+92 321 5020666
Skype: usamadar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Cc: munir.usama@gmail.com, mpaesold@gmx.at, nikkhils@gmail.com, jd@commandprompt.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, david@fetter.org, jonah.harris@gmail.com, pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Partition: use triggers instead of rules
In-Reply-To: <ff0e67090711290748tcae3037lb3aac4eb5423c6df@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox