pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: A test for replay of regression tests
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2022 21:11:24 -0500
Message-ID: <1046818.1643767884@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+hUKGK6mG8-6VieDm3sz2yzqMqw7j_=ag=_XmKLKsS-hG6KQw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <YbmsZbEO1QGMymNF@paquier.xyz>
	<YbqG0DsKGRBnY/4t@paquier.xyz>
	<CA+hUKGK-+mg6RWiDu0JudF6jWeL5+gPmi8EKUm1eAzmdbwiE_A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+hUKG+GBC-6QhOKt6Y7ccrXSjbRHB7Di295=0rAGhE7a7hSrQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+hUKGLneD+q+E7upHGwn41KGvbxhsKbJ+M-y9nvv7_Xjv8Qog@mail.gmail.com>
	<20220114234947.av4kkhuj7netsy5r@alap3.anarazel.de>
	<CA+hUKG+yxxnFWvp4h_HgJvptQ2uKE4aKtDd7e5nmr61Soe6a2Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20220121194827.7eau4ulhrfol3npd@alap3.anarazel.de>
	<CA+hUKGK65xVqNgsSPyrr2LEwtfUN=GfEuQ868hTC-mu0bFG42A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+hUKG+1=MpM2aXOHhXE9myBqMsgV4N0fOTgCqubZZ_mXgRuQg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20220202011402.e7t3hu3jusalr32h@alap3.anarazel.de>
	<CA+hUKGK6mG8-6VieDm3sz2yzqMqw7j_=ag=_XmKLKsS-hG6KQw@mail.gmail.com>

Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> It looks like it's processing statements fairly consistently slowly
> through the whole period.   Each non-trivial statement takes a bit
> under ~10ms, so it would make sense if by the time we've processed
> ~2.5k lines we've clocked up 30 seconds and a VACUUM replay whacks us.

This test is set up to time out after 30 seconds?  We've long had
an unofficial baseline that no timeouts under 180 seconds should
be used in the buildfarm.

			regards, tom lane





view thread (82+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1046818.1643767884@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../1046818.1643767884@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1046818.1643767884@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, thomas.munro@gmail.com, andres@anarazel.de, michael@paquier.xyz, andrew@dunslane.net, lubennikovaav@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: A test for replay of regression tests
  In-Reply-To: <1046818.1643767884@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox